vivo Y75 5G vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: The Ultimate Showdown

The mid-range 5G smartphone market is heating up, and today we're pitting two contenders against each other: the vivo Y75 5G and the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite. Both offer 5G connectivity and a range of features, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive in and find out.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster 67W charging and the more efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset. While the vivo Y75 5G has a decent display, the Nord CE 3 Lite's superior charging and performance make it the better value.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo Y75 5G OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International
5G bands78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5GGSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G
 -1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India
Launch
Announced2022, January 272023, April 04
StatusAvailable. Released 2022, January 27Available. Released 2023, April 11
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame, plastic backGlass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions164 x 75.9 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in)165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight187 g (6.60 oz)195 g (6.88 oz)
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass
Resolution1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density)
Size6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio)6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm)
GPUMali-G57 MC2Adreno 619
OSAndroid 11, Funtouch 12Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 8GB RAM128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 -UFS 2.2
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.0, (wide)-
Triple50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Video1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS1080p@30fps
Selfie camera
Features-HDR, panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.0, (wide)16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.1, A2DP, LE5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD
NFCNoYes (market/region dependent)
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDSGPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0, OTG
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging18W wired67W wired, 80% in 30 min
Type5000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsGlowing Galaxy, Starlight BlackPastel Lime, Chromatic Gray
ModelsV2142CPH2467, CPH2465
PriceAbout 260 EUR£ 169.98 / € 209.99
SAR-1.17 W/kg (head)     0.70 W/kg (body)
Tests
Performance- AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo Y75 5G

  • Vibrant AMOLED display
  • Sleek design
  • Decent camera

  • Slow 18W charging
  • Older chipset
  • Less efficient performance

OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite

  • Fast 67W charging
  • Efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
  • High-resolution 108MP camera
  • Good value

  • LCD display (less vibrant than AMOLED)
  • Plastic build feels less premium
  • Software updates can be inconsistent

Display Comparison

Both phones feature a 6.72-inch display, but the vivo Y75 5G boasts an AMOLED panel with a 120Hz refresh rate, offering richer colors and smoother scrolling compared to the Nord CE 3 Lite's LCD. The Nord CE 3 Lite's display is still perfectly adequate, but the Y75 5G has a noticeable edge in visual quality.

Camera Comparison

The vivo Y75 5G features a 64MP main camera, while the Nord CE 3 Lite has a 108MP main camera. While megapixels aren't everything, the Nord CE 3 Lite generally captures more detailed photos, especially in good lighting. Both phones offer decent ultrawide and macro lenses, but image processing differs – vivo tends to saturate colors more.

Performance

The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, built on a 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance boost over the vivo Y75 5G's Dimensity 700. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Nord CE 3 Lite. The Dimensity 700 is capable, but it shows its age compared to the newer Snapdragon.

Battery Life

This is where the Nord CE 3 Lite truly shines. Its 5000mAh battery combined with 67W fast charging allows for incredibly quick top-ups. The vivo Y75 5G's 5000mAh battery and 18W charging are adequate, but significantly slower. Expect a full charge in under 40 minutes on the Nord CE 3 Lite versus over an hour on the Y75 5G.

Buying Guide

The vivo Y75 5G is a good choice for users prioritizing a vibrant display and a sleek design, and who don't mind slower charging. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite is ideal for those who value fast charging, smooth performance, and a more modern chipset, even if it means a slightly less premium feel.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Which phone has better battery life?
While both have 5000mAh batteries, the OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite's 67W charging means it charges much faster, effectively giving you more usable battery time throughout the day.
❓ Is the vivo Y75 5G's AMOLED display worth the extra cost?
If you prioritize vibrant colors and deep blacks, then yes. However, the Nord CE 3 Lite's LCD is still a good display, and the performance benefits might outweigh the display advantage for many users.