The Xiaomi Poco F3 GT and vivo Y74s both leverage Mediatek's Dimensity series, but target different segments. The F3 GT, initially positioned as a gaming-focused device, now faces competition from the more affordable Y74s. This comparison dissects their core differences to help you decide which offers the best value for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT is the clear winner, thanks to its Dimensity 1200 chipset and 67W charging. However, the vivo Y74s provides a solid experience at a lower price point, making it ideal for everyday tasks and light gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 22 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 22 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 34 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4100 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | V2009A | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y74s
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 810 chipset
- Slower charging speeds compared to the F3 GT
- Less powerful chipset for demanding games
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Significantly faster Dimensity 1200 processor
- 67W fast charging for quick top-ups
- Likely superior gaming performance
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the Poco F3 GT's gaming focus, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel (120Hz or higher) compared to the Y74s, which likely sticks to a standard 60Hz. The F3 GT likely boasts higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. Bezels are expected to be similar, reflecting the mid-range nature of both devices. Color accuracy will depend on panel calibration, but the F3 GT may offer more color profile options geared towards gamers.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Poco F3 GT, being positioned as a more premium device, likely features a larger main sensor with a wider aperture, resulting in better low-light performance. The Y74s likely employs a more cost-effective camera setup. Image processing styles will also differ; Xiaomi typically leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while vivo often aims for more natural tones. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is probable on the F3 GT, but unlikely on the Y74s.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F3 GT’s Dimensity 1200, built on a 6nm process, significantly outperforms the Y74s’ Dimensity 810. The 1200’s prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz (Cortex-A78) versus the 810’s 2.4 GHz (Cortex-A76) provides a substantial CPU advantage. The 1200 also features more powerful Mali-G68 MC4 GPU compared to the 810’s Mali-G56 MC2, translating to higher frame rates in games. While both use 6nm fabrication, the architectural improvements in the 1200 yield better sustained performance and thermal management. The F3 GT likely benefits from more aggressive cooling solutions, further enhancing its gaming capabilities.
Battery Life
The Poco F3 GT’s 67W charging is a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in 42 minutes. The Y74s’ 44W charging, while respectable, takes longer to reach 70% in 34 minutes, implying a longer total charge time. Battery capacity isn't specified, but the F3 GT’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Dimensity 1200’s efficiency, combined with optimized software, could also contribute to comparable real-world battery life despite the charging disparity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y74s if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for social media, streaming, and casual gaming, and value affordability above all else. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you prioritize a smoother gaming experience, faster charging speeds, and are willing to spend a bit more for a noticeable performance boost, especially in demanding titles.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 810 in the vivo Y74s sufficient for playing PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 810 can handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. However, for consistently high frame rates and smoother gameplay, especially with demanding graphics, the Dimensity 1200 in the Poco F3 GT is the better choice.
❓ Does the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT get excessively hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip and can generate heat under sustained load. The Poco F3 GT likely incorporates cooling solutions to mitigate this, but some throttling may occur during extended gaming. The Y74s, with its less powerful chipset, will likely run cooler.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Poco F3 GT compare to other fast charging technologies?
67W charging is exceptionally fast, placing it among the quickest charging speeds available. It supports PD3.0 and QC3 standards, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of chargers. The Y74s’ 44W charging is still fast, but takes considerably longer to fully charge the device.
❓ Which phone is better for watching videos and browsing the web?
Both phones are perfectly capable of handling video streaming and web browsing. The Poco F3 GT's potentially brighter display might offer a slightly better viewing experience in bright sunlight, but the difference is unlikely to be significant for typical use.
