OnePlus Nord 2 5G vs vivo Y74s: Which Mid-Range 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Y74s’ Dimensity 810, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a better gaming experience. While the Y74s offers respectable performance, the Nord 2’s overall package is more compelling.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y74s | OnePlus Nord 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 22 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 22 | Available. Released 2021, July 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75 x 7.8 mm (6.45 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 175 g (6.17 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, SBAS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 70% in 34 min | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | 4100 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Aurora | Gray Sierra, Blue Haze, Green Wood, Pac-Man Edition |
| Models | V2009A | DN2101, DN2103 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | € 189.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 148.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 512164 (v8) | 598022 (v9) GeekBench: 2792 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y74s
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Competitive 44W fast charging
- Significantly weaker chipset compared to the Nord 2
- Limited display information suggests a less premium experience
- Camera performance likely lags behind the Nord 2
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Faster 65W charging with PD support
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Higher price compared to the Y74s
- May not offer significant camera improvements over competitors
- Software experience can be polarizing for some users
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 633 nits, suggesting a more visible display in direct sunlight compared to the Y74s, for which display brightness data is unavailable. While both utilize LCD technology (inferred from market positioning), the Nord 2’s higher brightness and infinite contrast ratio (nominal) contribute to a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. The lack of detailed display specs for the Y74s suggests a more cost-optimized panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The OnePlus Nord 2 5G likely benefits from a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 1200, enabling better noise reduction and dynamic range. Without specific sensor size or aperture data for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but OnePlus generally prioritizes camera performance in its mid-range offerings. The Y74s likely employs a more budget-focused camera system.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) features a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core, complemented by 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration significantly outperforms the vivo Y74s’ Dimensity 810 (6nm) with its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Dimensity 1200’s higher clock speeds and more powerful core architecture translate to approximately 30-40% faster CPU performance in benchmarks, and a substantial improvement in GPU capabilities. This benefits gamers and users running resource-intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 102 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite potential differences in battery capacity (not specified for the Y74s). However, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G’s 65W wired charging with PD support offers a significant advantage, achieving a full charge in just 30 minutes. The Y74s’ 44W charging, while respectable, takes 34 minutes to reach 70%, implying a longer total charge time. This faster charging speed on the Nord 2 5G is a crucial convenience factor for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y74s if you prioritize affordability and a decent, everyday smartphone experience. It’s a solid option for users who primarily browse the web, use social media, and make occasional calls. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2 5G if you demand more from your phone – faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, quicker charging, and a potentially more refined software experience. It’s ideal for power users and those who want a phone that will remain responsive for years to come.