The Oppo K11 and vivo Y73t represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take distinctly different approaches to processing power and charging speed. This comparison dissects their key specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo K11 emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 782G chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the vivo Y73t’s Dimensity 700, and the 100W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, fully charging the device in just 26 minutes. However, the Y73t may appeal to budget-conscious buyers prioritizing affordability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 29 | 2023, July 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 29 | Available. Released 2023, August 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 162.7 x 75.5 x 8.2 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201.5 g (7.13 oz) | 184 g (6.49 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typical), 1100 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.7 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 11 | Android 13, ColorOS 13.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | - | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 33 min | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Moonshadow Gray; Glacier Blue |
| Models | V2164PA | PJC110 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | - |
vivo Y73t
- Faster charging with 44W support
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Reliable Dimensity 700 chipset for everyday tasks
- Slower processor compared to Snapdragon 782G
- Longer charging times
Oppo K11
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 782G processor
- Blazing-fast 100W SuperVOOC charging
- Potentially better camera performance
- Likely a higher price tag
- May experience slightly more heat under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the price points, both likely feature LCD panels with FHD+ resolution. The Oppo K11, being positioned slightly higher, may benefit from a higher peak brightness and potentially a slightly more refined color calibration. However, without specific data, it's difficult to definitively state a display advantage. Expect standard 60Hz refresh rates on both.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The Oppo K11, given its slightly higher positioning, may feature a larger primary sensor with a wider aperture, resulting in better low-light performance and more detailed images. Image processing algorithms will also play a role, and Oppo’s typically prioritize vibrant, social media-ready photos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K11’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G (6nm) boasts a prime Cortex-A78 core clocked at 2.7 GHz, alongside three additional A78 cores and four A55 cores. This configuration significantly outperforms the vivo Y73t’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm), which uses two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz and six A55 cores. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 782G also contributes to improved power efficiency and sustained performance under load. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the K11.
Battery Life
The Oppo K11’s 100W SuperVOOC charging is a standout feature, capable of fully charging the device in a mere 26 minutes. The vivo Y73t’s 44W charging, while respectable, takes considerably longer, reaching 50% in 33 minutes. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging of the K11 effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery, offering more usable uptime throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y73t if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize a lower upfront cost. Buy the Oppo K11 if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for demanding apps and games, and value incredibly fast charging speeds that minimize downtime. The K11 is the better choice for power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 700 in the vivo Y73t sufficient for playing PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 700 can handle PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. The Oppo K11’s Snapdragon 782G will provide a smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the Oppo K11 compared to the 44W charging on the vivo Y73t in real-world use?
The Oppo K11 can go from 0% to 100% in approximately 26 minutes, while the vivo Y73t takes significantly longer. This means you can quickly top up your K11 during short breaks, minimizing downtime, whereas the Y73t requires a more substantial charging period.
❓ Will the Snapdragon 782G in the Oppo K11 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 782G is a powerful chip, Qualcomm has implemented thermal management features to mitigate overheating. However, prolonged gaming at maximum settings may still result in some heat buildup. The K11's 6nm process node is more efficient than the Y73t's 7nm, helping to manage temperatures.
