The OnePlus Ace 2V and vivo Y73t represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Ace 2V aims for near-flagship performance with its Dimensity 9000 chipset, while the Y73t prioritizes affordability with the Dimensity 700. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and fast charging, the OnePlus Ace 2V is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9000 offers a substantial leap over the Y73t’s Dimensity 700. However, the vivo Y73t remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers who don't demand top-tier processing power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA 800 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 29 | 2023, March 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 29 | Available. Released 2023, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Asahi Glass), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 162.6 x 75.1 x 8.2 mm (6.40 x 2.96 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201.5 g (7.13 oz) | 191.5 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Asahi Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1100 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 11 | Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | - | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 33 min | 80W wired, 100% in 32 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Orange | Black, Blue/Green |
| Models | V2164PA | PHP110 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 310 EUR |
vivo Y73t
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset
- Significantly slower performance than the Ace 2V
- Likely lacks advanced display features (high refresh rate, AMOLED)
- Slower charging speeds
OnePlus Ace 2V
- Flagship-level performance with Dimensity 9000
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Likely features a superior display (AMOLED, high refresh rate)
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more demanding on battery life
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
Context data lacks display specifics. Given the Y73t’s positioning, it likely features a 60Hz LCD panel, prioritizing cost savings. The Ace 2V, being a step up, likely boasts a higher refresh rate AMOLED display, potentially 120Hz, offering smoother visuals and more vibrant colors. The Ace 2V’s panel is expected to have higher peak brightness, improving outdoor visibility. Bezels are also likely slimmer on the Ace 2V, contributing to a more immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Without specific sensor details, we can infer differences based on market positioning. The Ace 2V likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The Y73t likely employs a more basic camera setup, potentially lacking OIS. Lens apertures will likely be wider on the Ace 2V, allowing more light to reach the sensor. Image processing algorithms will also differ, with the Ace 2V likely offering more sophisticated features and better dynamic range. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Ace 2V’s Dimensity 9000, fabricated on a 4nm process, delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance compared to the vivo Y73t’s 7nm Dimensity 700. The Dimensity 9000’s Cortex-X2 prime core (3.05 GHz) provides a substantial boost in single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smooth UI navigation. The Ace 2V’s GPU will handle graphically intensive games with ease, while the Y73t will likely struggle with demanding titles at higher settings. The Ace 2V likely utilizes faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance. Thermal management will also be superior on the Ace 2V due to the more efficient 4nm process, reducing throttling during prolonged gaming sessions.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Ace 2V’s 80W charging is a game-changer. Achieving a full charge in 32 minutes is significantly faster than the Y73t’s 44W charging, which takes 33 minutes to reach 50%. This faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. The actual battery life will depend on capacity and usage patterns, but the more efficient Dimensity 9000 in the Ace 2V may offset a potentially smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y73t if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, and value affordability above all else. Buy the OnePlus Ace 2V if you’re a power user who demands smooth multitasking, enjoys demanding mobile games, and appreciates significantly faster charging speeds – and are willing to pay a premium for it.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 700 in the vivo Y73t struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Dimensity 700 is not designed for high-end gaming. While it can run Genshin Impact, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering during intense scenes.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the OnePlus Ace 2V compared to the 44W charging on the vivo Y73t in real-world use?
The 80W charging on the Ace 2V provides a substantial time saving. While the Y73t takes 33 minutes to reach 50%, the Ace 2V can fully charge in 32 minutes. This means you can get a significant charge boost in a shorter amount of time, making it ideal for users who are always on the go.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Dimensity 9000 and Dimensity 700 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks, the difference might not be immediately apparent. However, the Dimensity 9000 offers a much smoother and more responsive experience when multitasking, switching between apps, and loading complex web pages. The Y73t may exhibit slight lag or stuttering in these scenarios.
