The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and the vivo Y73s represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Poco X3 Pro aggressively targets gamers with its flagship-level processor, while the vivo Y73s prioritizes a balance of features and efficiency for everyday use. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage, particularly in gaming, and its 33W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the vivo Y73s is a capable device, it simply can't match the Poco's raw power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 12. Released 2020, October 16 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74 x 7.8 mm (6.34 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171.3 g (6.03 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 4100 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | V2031A | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y73s
- Significantly faster processor (Snapdragon 860)
- Faster 33W charging
- Better gaming performance
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
- Software experience may be less refined than vivo’s Funtouch OS
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- More efficient processor (Dimensity 720)
- Potentially more streamlined software experience
- Slightly lower price (depending on region)
- Significantly slower processor
- Slower 18W charging
- Inferior gaming performance
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and panel type are missing for the Y73s. The Poco X3 Pro’s display, while not explicitly detailed beyond contrast, benefits from the overall system performance to deliver a fluid experience. Without further data on the Y73s’ panel, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or outdoor visibility compared to the Poco.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s superior processing power likely translates to faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Y73s may focus on software-based enhancements, but it’s unlikely to overcome the hardware advantage of the Poco. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are included for marketing purposes rather than significant photographic utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a significant step up from the vivo Y73s’ MediaTek Dimensity 720 (7nm). The Snapdragon 860’s octa-core configuration, with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, delivers substantially higher CPU and GPU performance. The Dimensity 720, while competent, is geared towards efficiency rather than outright speed. This translates to smoother gameplay, faster app loading times, and better multitasking on the Poco X3 Pro. The Snapdragon 860’s Adreno 640 GPU will handle graphically intensive games at higher settings than the Mali-G57 MC3 in the Y73s.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Y73s’ 18W charging. The Poco can reach 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, minimizing downtime. While the Y73s’ battery life may be similar, the slower charging speed means longer periods tethered to a power outlet.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y73s if you prioritize a smooth, responsive experience for basic tasks like social media, browsing, and light multimedia consumption, and value a more streamlined software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you're a mobile gamer, frequently multitask demanding applications, or simply want the fastest possible performance in this price bracket. The Poco is also ideal for users who appreciate faster charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known to generate heat under sustained load. While the Poco X3 Pro includes thermal management features, some throttling is possible during prolonged gaming. However, the performance headroom is significant enough that throttling is less impactful than the performance difference compared to the Dimensity 720.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo Y73s slow compared to modern standards?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow compared to the 33W charging on the Poco X3 Pro and other modern smartphones. Expect significantly longer charging times, potentially exceeding 2 hours for a full charge.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro support high refresh rate gaming?
The Poco X3 Pro features a 120Hz display, and the Snapdragon 860 is capable of pushing high frame rates in many popular games. However, achieving consistently high frame rates depends on the game's optimization and graphics settings.
❓ What kind of user would benefit most from the vivo Y73s?
The vivo Y73s is best suited for users who prioritize a smooth and reliable experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption. It's a good choice for those who don't require high-end gaming performance or demanding multitasking capabilities.
