Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G vs. vivo Y73s: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset offers significantly better CPU and GPU performance, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, the A52s 5G’s faster 25W charging mitigates any potential battery concerns.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y73s | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA 800 / 1900 & TD-SCDMA | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 12. Released 2020, October 16 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74 x 7.8 mm (6.34 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171.3 g (6.03 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10 | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 720 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual Proximity Sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 4100 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | V2031A | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 280 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 113h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.5 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9) GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1) GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y73s
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster 25W charging for quicker top-ups
- Potentially higher price point
- May not offer expandable storage (depending on region)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More affordable price
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery life
- Slower processor limits performance
- Dimmer display may struggle in sunlight
- Slower 18W charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y73s. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the A52s 5G’s superior brightness and likely better color calibration contribute to a more immersive viewing experience. The lack of detailed display specs for the Y73s suggests a more budget-oriented panel.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Y73s. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise and potentially a larger main sensor (though specifics are unavailable). While both phones likely include standard features like HDR and night mode, the A52s 5G’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Snapdragon 778G will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The prevalence of low-resolution auxiliary cameras on budget phones suggests the Y73s may rely heavily on software processing, potentially sacrificing detail.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G (6nm) is a significant step up from the vivo Y73s’ MediaTek Dimensity 720 (7nm). The Snapdragon 778G features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, versus the Y73s’ 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to approximately 20-30% faster CPU performance in benchmarks. Furthermore, the Snapdragon 778G’s Adreno 642L GPU provides a substantial advantage in graphics performance, making the A52s 5G the clear winner for gaming. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y73s and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging is significantly faster than the Y73s’ 18W charging. This means the A52s 5G can replenish its battery much more quickly, minimizing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed provides a practical advantage for users who frequently need to top up their devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y73s if you prioritize affordability and basic 5G connectivity without demanding high-end performance. It’s a solid option for casual users who primarily browse, message, and consume media. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value a smoother user experience, better gaming capabilities, and a brighter, more vibrant display. It’s the ideal choice for users who want a phone that can handle demanding tasks and provide a more premium feel.