Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) vs. vivo Y73: A Detailed Performance and Charging Showdown

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China variant) and the vivo Y73 represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid user experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in chipset and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user prioritizing performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset offers a substantial performance uplift over the vivo Y73’s Helio G95, and the 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime. The Y73 remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget or with less demanding needs.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo Y73 Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 411, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42
5G bands-1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6
SpeedHSPA, LTEHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G
 -CDMA2000 1xEV-DO
Launch
Announced2021, June 102021, May 26
StatusAvailable. Released 2021, June 12Available. Released 2021, June 02
Body
Build-Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions161.2 x 74.4 x 7.4 mm (6.35 x 2.93 x 0.29 in)163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight170 g (6.00 oz)193 g (6.81 oz)
 -IP53, dust and splash resistant
Display
Protection-Corning Gorilla Glass Victus
Resolution1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density)1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density)
Size6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio)6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLED, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 570 nits (HBM)IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm)
GPUMali-G76 MC4Mali-G77 MC9
OSAndroid 11, Funtouch 11.1Android 11, MIUI 12.5
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)No
Internal128GB 8GB RAM128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 -UFS 3.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama
Single-16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Triple64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro)
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR
Selfie camera
Features-Panorama, HDR
Single16 MP, f/2.0, (wide)16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR
Sound
3.5mm jack -No
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
 -24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.2, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS
RadioFM radioNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass
 -Virtual proximity sensing
Battery
Charging33W wired, 61% in 30 min67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min
Type4000 mAhLi-Po 5000 mAh
Misc
ColorsDiamond Flare, Roman BlackStargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White
ModelsV2059, V2146, V2212, V2168-
PriceAbout 240 EURAbout 200 EUR
SAR0.72 W/kg (head)     0.48 W/kg (body)-

vivo Y73

  • More powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset
  • Significantly faster 67W charging
  • Potentially better image processing

  • May be slightly more expensive
  • China variant may have software limitations for some users

Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)

  • Lower price point
  • Adequate performance for basic tasks
  • Decent 33W charging

  • Helio G95 chipset is less powerful
  • Slower charging compared to the Redmi Note 10 Pro

Display Comparison

While display specifications aren't provided, both phones likely feature LCD panels common in this price bracket. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s potential for a higher peak brightness, given its more powerful chipset capable of driving a more demanding display, is a likely advantage. The Y73, relying on the Helio G95, may exhibit slightly lower brightness levels. Color accuracy is also likely to be better on the Redmi Note 10 Pro due to more advanced image processing capabilities.

Camera Comparison

Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) within the Dimensity 1100 chipset will likely result in superior image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. The chipset’s ability to handle more complex algorithms allows for better noise reduction and dynamic range. While both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s processing power will likely extract more detail and clarity from its sensors.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6nm) is a significant leap ahead of the vivo Y73’s Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm). The Dimensity 1100 utilizes more efficient 6nm fabrication, resulting in better thermal management and sustained performance. Its Cortex-A78 cores (4x2.6 GHz) offer substantially higher single-core performance than the Y73’s Cortex-A76 cores (2x2.05 GHz). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience. The Y73’s Helio G95 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive games and demanding applications.

Battery Life

The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 42 minutes. This is significantly faster than the vivo Y73’s 33W charging, which takes approximately 30 minutes to reach 61%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 10 Pro effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 1100 also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially extending battery life during typical usage.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo Y73 if you need a functional smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light photography, and prioritize a lower price point. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and value the convenience of incredibly fast charging. The Redmi Note 10 Pro is geared towards power users, while the Y73 caters to basic smartphone needs.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Does the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro get noticeably warmer during extended gaming sessions compared to the Helio G95 in the vivo Y73?
While the Dimensity 1100 is more powerful, its 6nm process node is more efficient, leading to better thermal management. The Helio G95, being on a 12nm node, will likely generate more heat under sustained load. However, both phones may experience throttling to prevent overheating, but the Redmi Note 10 Pro should maintain higher frame rates for longer periods.
❓ Is the difference in charging speed between 33W and 67W truly noticeable in everyday use with the vivo Y73 and Redmi Note 10 Pro?
Absolutely. The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 10 Pro allows for a full charge in approximately 42 minutes, while the Y73 takes considerably longer. This difference is particularly impactful for users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly top up their battery before leaving the house or during a busy day.
❓ Will the Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) receive regular software updates and security patches?
Software update support for the China variant can be less consistent than for global versions. Users may need to rely on custom ROMs or unofficial updates to receive the latest Android versions and security patches. This is a key consideration for users prioritizing long-term software support.