The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and vivo Y73 represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Poco X3 Pro aggressively targets gamers with a flagship-level processor, while the vivo Y73 prioritizes a balanced feature set with a focus on everyday usability and fast charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and raw performance, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 860 chipset. However, the vivo Y73 provides a compelling alternative for those seeking a well-rounded experience with quick 33W charging and a more streamlined user interface.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 10 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 12 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.4 x 7.4 mm (6.35 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 570 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 61% in 30 min | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Diamond Flare, Roman Black | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | V2059, V2146, V2212, V2168 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y73
- Faster 33W charging (61% in 30 mins)
- Potentially more streamlined software experience
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Significantly weaker processor compared to the Poco X3 Pro
- Limited camera information available
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 860 processor for superior gaming
- Excellent performance for the price
- Long battery endurance (112h)
- Slightly slower full charge time (59 mins)
- May experience more thermal throttling under sustained load
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and panel type are missing for the vivo Y73. The Poco X3 Pro, while not boasting cutting-edge display technology, delivers a solid viewing experience. Without further data on the Y73’s panel, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or outdoor visibility compared to the Poco.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture details, or image processing algorithms, a direct comparison is challenging. The absence of information on the vivo Y73’s camera system makes it difficult to assess its low-light performance or dynamic range. We can assume the Poco X3 Pro, given its higher overall positioning, likely benefits from more advanced image processing features. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests limited utility for serious photography.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) significantly outperforms the vivo Y73’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). The Snapdragon 860 features a 1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold core alongside three additional Gold cores and four Silver cores, providing a substantial advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. The Helio G95’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration, while capable, simply cannot match the Snapdragon’s processing power. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and better multitasking on the Poco X3 Pro. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 860 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices support 33W wired charging, with the Poco X3 Pro reaching 59% in 30 minutes and a full charge in 59 minutes, while the vivo Y73 achieves 61% in 30 minutes. Both phones have an endurance rating of 112 hours, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. The slightly faster charging speed of the vivo Y73 is offset by the Poco X3 Pro’s more power-hungry chipset, meaning the Poco may require more frequent charging during intensive use.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y73 if you need a reliable daily driver with fast charging and a focus on media consumption. Its Helio G95 chipset is sufficient for most tasks, and the 33W charging gets you back up and running quickly. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize mobile gaming, demanding applications, and future-proofing. The Snapdragon 860 offers a substantial performance leap, making it ideal for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known for its strong performance, but it can generate heat under sustained load. The Poco X3 Pro incorporates thermal management solutions, but some throttling is possible during extended gaming. However, it's generally well-managed and doesn't lead to significant performance drops.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the vivo Y73 fast enough for daily use?
Yes, 33W charging is considered fast charging and should be sufficient for most users. Reaching 61% in 30 minutes provides a significant top-up, and a full charge is achievable in a reasonable timeframe. This is particularly beneficial for users who prefer not to charge their phones overnight.
❓ Does the Poco X3 Pro support high refresh rate gaming?
The Poco X3 Pro features a 120Hz display, which significantly enhances the gaming experience in supported titles. Many popular games can be played at 60fps or higher, taking full advantage of the smoother visuals.
❓ How does the Helio G95 in the vivo Y73 handle demanding applications?
The Helio G95 is a capable processor for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, it will struggle with very demanding applications or graphically intensive games compared to the Snapdragon 860 in the Poco X3 Pro. Expect some slowdowns or reduced graphical settings in such scenarios.
