The vivo Y73 and Realme 8 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take different approaches to achieving it. The Y73 leans on MediaTek’s Helio G95 for processing power, while the Realme 8 Pro opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 720G. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Realme 8 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 720G, built on an 8nm process, offers a more efficient architecture than the Y73’s 12nm Helio G95, translating to better sustained performance and potentially longer battery life despite similar endurance ratings.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 10 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 12 | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.4 x 7.4 mm (6.35 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 570 nits (HBM) | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 61% in 30 min | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | 4000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Diamond Flare, Roman Black | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | V2059, V2146, V2212, V2168 | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 116h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y73
- Potentially higher burst CPU performance due to higher clock speeds.
- Competitive price point within the mid-range segment.
- Decent battery endurance (116h).
- Less efficient 12nm chipset leads to potential throttling.
- Slower 33W charging compared to the Realme 8 Pro.
- Lack of detailed camera specifications.
Realme 8 Pro
- More efficient 8nm Snapdragon 720G for sustained performance.
- Significantly faster 50W charging (0-100% in 47 minutes).
- Strong brand reputation for camera software optimization.
- Slightly lower CPU clock speeds compared to the vivo Y73.
- Similar battery endurance to the vivo Y73.
- Display specifications are largely unknown.
Display Comparison
Both the vivo Y73 and Realme 8 Pro feature displays with an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed specifications like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing. Given the market positioning, it’s safe to assume both utilize 60Hz panels. The lack of detailed display specs makes it difficult to definitively declare a winner; however, Realme often focuses on display calibration, potentially offering a more accurate color experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specific sensor details are absent. Without knowing megapixel counts, sensor sizes, or aperture values, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Realme often emphasizes camera features in its Pro line, suggesting a potentially more refined camera experience. The absence of information on features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) further complicates the assessment. It's likely both phones rely on software processing to enhance image quality, but the Realme 8 Pro’s brand reputation hints at a more sophisticated algorithm.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm) boasts a more efficient architecture than the vivo Y73’s Helio G95 (12nm). While the Y73’s CPU features slightly higher clock speeds on its Cortex-A76 cores (2.05 GHz vs 2.3 GHz on the Kryo 465 Gold), the Snapdragon 720G’s superior process node and optimized Kryo cores provide better sustained performance and thermal management. This means the Realme 8 Pro is less likely to throttle under prolonged load, making it the better choice for gamers. The 8nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 116 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Realme 8 Pro’s 50W wired charging is substantially faster, reaching 50% in just 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes. The vivo Y73’s 33W charging takes considerably longer, reaching 61% in 30 minutes. This difference in charging speed is a major advantage for the Realme 8 Pro, offering significantly more convenience for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y73 if you prioritize a slightly more powerful CPU core clock speed for bursty tasks and are comfortable with a slower charging experience. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you value a more efficient chipset for sustained performance during gaming or multitasking, coupled with significantly faster 50W charging that gets you from 0 to 100% in under an hour. The Realme 8 Pro is the better choice for users who demand reliable performance and convenience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 720G is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty at medium to high settings. Its 8nm process and optimized architecture provide better thermal management than the Helio G95, reducing the likelihood of significant frame drops during extended gaming sessions. While not a flagship-level gaming experience, it offers a smooth and enjoyable experience for most mobile gamers.
❓ How much of a difference will the charging speed make in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Realme 8 Pro’s 50W charging can add hours of usage in just minutes, making it ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery. The vivo Y73’s 33W charging, while adequate, requires significantly more time to achieve a full charge, potentially causing inconvenience for those with busy lifestyles.
❓ Is the Helio G95 in the vivo Y73 still a capable processor for everyday tasks?
Yes, the Helio G95 is perfectly capable of handling everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and video streaming. However, it may exhibit more noticeable slowdowns when multitasking or running demanding applications compared to the Snapdragon 720G.
