The vivo Y73 and Motorola Moto G60S represent a fascinating intersection in the budget-to-midrange smartphone space. Both devices leverage the Mediatek Helio G95 chipset, promising similar performance on paper. However, key differences in charging technology and potentially other optimizations create a compelling comparison for users prioritizing speed and convenience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G60S emerges as the stronger choice. While both phones share the same Helio G95 processor, the G60S’s 50W charging with Quick Charge 4 support significantly reduces downtime, making it ideal for those constantly on the go. The Y73 remains a viable option, but lags behind in charging speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 28, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 10 | 2021, August 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 12 | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161.2 x 74.4 x 7.4 mm (6.35 x 2.93 x 0.29 in) | 169.7 x 75.9 x 9.6 mm (6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 170 g (6.00 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| | - | Water repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~85.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, HDR10, 430 nits (typ), 570 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ), 562 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, (ultrawide)
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/120fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.2, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 61% in 30 min | 50W wired, QC4 |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Diamond Flare, Roman Black | Green, Blue |
| Models | V2059, V2146, V2212, V2168 | XT2133-2, XT2133-1 |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y73
- Potentially refined software experience (FunTouch OS)
- Sleek design (subjective)
- Competitive price point
- Slower 33W charging
- Lacks Quick Charge support
- Potentially less optimized thermal management
Motorola Moto G60S
- Significantly faster 50W charging with Quick Charge 4
- Larger display for immersive viewing
- Potentially better thermal management
- Stock Android may lack some advanced features
- Larger size may not suit all users
- Software updates may be less frequent
Display Comparison
Both the vivo Y73 and Moto G60S likely feature LCD panels, common in this price bracket. Without specific display specs like peak brightness or color gamut coverage, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. However, the Moto G60S’s larger 6.6-inch display (versus the Y73’s 6.44-inch) may offer a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on battery efficiency over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipset, a direct comparison is challenging. Both phones likely employ a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend heavily on sensor size, lens aperture, and image processing algorithms. It’s reasonable to assume both will include a primary sensor, an ultrawide, and potentially a macro or depth sensor. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests image stabilization will rely on software algorithms, potentially impacting low-light performance. Focusing on the primary sensor’s megapixel count and aperture would be crucial for a more informed assessment.
Performance
The core of both devices is the Mediatek Helio G95 (12 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means CPU performance will be virtually identical. Real-world performance differences will likely stem from RAM management and software optimization. The G60S’s potential for better thermal management due to its larger chassis could allow for sustained peak performance during extended gaming sessions, though this is speculative without thermal testing data. Both devices will handle everyday tasks and moderate gaming without issue.
Battery Life
The key differentiator here is charging speed. The Motorola Moto G60S boasts 50W wired charging with Quick Charge 4 support, allowing for a significantly faster recharge compared to the vivo Y73’s 33W charging. Vivo claims a 61% charge in 30 minutes, while the G60S can likely achieve a full charge in under an hour. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the G60S effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery, making it the more convenient option for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y73 if you prioritize a potentially more refined software experience (depending on vivo’s FunTouch OS version) and are less concerned with rapid recharging. Buy the Motorola Moto G60S if you value fast charging, Quick Charge compatibility for existing accessories, and a more straightforward Android experience. The G60S is the better pick for gamers and heavy users who need to minimize downtime.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G60S support Power Delivery (PD) charging, or is it exclusively Quick Charge?
The Moto G60S primarily supports Quick Charge 4. While it *may* negotiate a lower wattage charge with a PD charger, it won't utilize the full potential of PD. For optimal charging speeds, using a Quick Charge 4 compatible charger is recommended.
❓ Will I notice a significant difference in gaming performance between the vivo Y73 and the Moto G60S, given they both have the Helio G95?
While the Helio G95 is the same in both phones, the Moto G60S’s potentially better thermal management could allow it to sustain higher clock speeds for longer periods during gaming. This means less throttling and a more consistent frame rate, especially in demanding titles. However, the difference is likely to be subtle and dependent on the specific game and settings.
❓ Is the lack of a high refresh rate screen (90Hz or 120Hz) a dealbreaker on either of these phones?
For users accustomed to high refresh rate displays, the 60Hz panels on both the Y73 and G60S will feel less smooth. However, the impact on battery life is significant. If battery life is a priority, the 60Hz panels are a reasonable trade-off. If smooth scrolling and animations are crucial, you may need to consider a more expensive device.