Realme GT Neo 3T vs. vivo Y72t: A Detailed Comparison of Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Realme GT Neo 3T is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset and 80W charging significantly outperform the vivo Y72t’s Dimensity 700 and 18W charging. However, the Y72t offers a compelling option for budget-conscious users who prioritize efficiency over peak performance.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y72t | Realme GT Neo 3T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, June 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 23 | Available. Released 2022, June 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 162.9 x 75.8 x 8.7 mm (6.41 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.8 g (7.05 oz) | 194.5 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~398 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.62 inches, 105.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | - | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 80W wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Shade Black, Drifting White, Dash Yellow |
| Models | V2164A | RMX3372, RMX3371 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 118h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.2 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 726007 (v9) GeekBench: 3180 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y72t
- Efficient Dimensity 700 chipset for everyday tasks
- Potentially longer battery life due to lower power consumption
- More affordable price point
- Significantly lower performance compared to Snapdragon 870
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely less capable camera system
Realme GT Neo 3T
- Powerful Snapdragon 870 chipset for gaming and multitasking
- Ultra-fast 80W charging
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y72t
- May run warmer during intensive tasks
Display Comparison
The Realme GT Neo 3T boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 803 nits, compared to the unspecified brightness of the vivo Y72t. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED/OLED panels), the higher brightness of the GT Neo 3T ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. Details regarding panel technology (e.g., LTPO) and color accuracy are missing for both devices, but the GT Neo 3T’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or optical image stabilization (OIS). Without this information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Realme GT Neo 3T, positioned as a gaming and performance-focused device, likely incorporates a more capable camera system. The presence of a dedicated Night Mode or advanced image processing algorithms is probable on the GT Neo 3T, offering better low-light performance. The Y72t likely focuses on basic photography needs.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT Neo 3T’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y72t’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Snapdragon 870 features a Kryo 585 architecture with a prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, offering significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. The Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz are adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding games and multitasking. The Snapdragon 870’s superior GPU will translate to a smoother gaming experience. RAM configurations are not specified, but the chipset difference is the dominant factor.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the difference in charging speeds. However, the Realme GT Neo 3T’s 80W wired charging is a game-changer. This allows for a significantly faster 0-100% charge time compared to the vivo Y72t’s 18W charging. While the Y72t may offer slightly longer screen-on time due to the less power-hungry chipset, the convenience of rapid charging on the GT Neo 3T is a major advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y72t if you need a reliable, everyday smartphone with decent battery life and aren't heavily invested in mobile gaming or resource-intensive applications. Buy the Realme GT Neo 3T if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games, faster charging speeds, and a more responsive user experience, even if it means slightly reduced battery endurance.