OnePlus Nord 2T vs. vivo Y72t: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset and incredibly fast 80W charging justify the price premium. However, the vivo Y72t remains a viable option for those prioritizing affordability and basic functionality.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y72t | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, May 23 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, May 23 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.8 g (7.05 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 11 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | - | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | V2164A | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y72t
- More powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Significantly faster 80W charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Higher price point
- Potential for software bloat (OnePlus history)
OnePlus Nord 2T
- More affordable price
- Decent battery life (100h endurance)
- Acceptable performance for basic tasks
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful Dimensity 700 chipset
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 636 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors compared to the Y72t (brightness data unavailable). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels given the 'infinite' contrast ratio claim on the Nord 2T, the Nord 2T’s higher brightness is a tangible advantage. The lack of detailed display specs for the Y72t suggests a more basic panel, potentially impacting color accuracy and viewing angles. The Nord 2T’s display is better suited for media consumption in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Nord 2T’s higher processing power likely allows for more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Y72t, while capable, will likely rely on simpler processing techniques. The absence of information regarding OIS on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s Mediatek Dimensity 1300, built on a 6nm process, significantly outperforms the vivo Y72t’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Nord 2T’s CPU configuration – a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 and 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – provides a considerable boost in single-core and multi-core performance compared to the Y72t’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Nord 2T. The 6nm node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the charging experience is where they diverge dramatically. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging, with PD support, can fully charge the battery in a fraction of the time compared to the Y72t’s 18W wired charging. This is a significant convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. While the Y72t’s battery may last a comparable amount of time on a single charge, the Nord 2T’s charging speed offers a far more flexible usage pattern.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y72t if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and you're on a strict budget. It's ideal for users who don't heavily game or require rapid charging. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you prioritize performance for gaming and demanding apps, value incredibly fast charging, and are willing to spend a bit more for a smoother, more responsive experience. It's the better choice for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick battery top-up.