Both the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and the vivo Y72 5G target the competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market, but they approach it with different philosophies. The Poco X3 Pro prioritizes raw processing power, while the vivo Y72 5G aims for a more well-rounded experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 860 chipset. However, the vivo Y72 5G offers a solid, efficient experience for everyday use and benefits from a more balanced feature set, making it ideal for the average smartphone user.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 31 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Black, Dream Glow | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | V2041 | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y72 5G
- Faster charging with 33W support
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 860
- Better suited for demanding games and applications
- Potentially lower battery efficiency due to powerful chipset
- May run warmer under heavy load
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Good battery life with 112-hour endurance rating
- More power-efficient chipset
- Slower charging speed at 18W
- Less capable for gaming and demanding applications
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and panel type are missing for the vivo Y72 5G. Given the Poco X3 Pro’s focus on gaming, it’s likely to have a slightly more responsive panel, though both will provide adequate viewing experiences for typical use. Without further data on the Y72 5G, it's difficult to assess its color accuracy or outdoor visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms. The absence of these details makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the market positioning of the Poco X3 Pro suggests a greater emphasis on camera versatility, potentially including features like 4K video recording. The Y72 5G likely focuses on providing acceptable image quality for social media sharing, but may lack the advanced features found on the Poco.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) boasts a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, alongside three additional performance cores running at 2.42 GHz, and four efficiency cores at 1.78 GHz. This configuration demonstrably outperforms the vivo Y72 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Snapdragon 860’s architecture is geared towards sustained performance, crucial for gaming, while the Dimensity 700 prioritizes power efficiency. This translates to smoother gameplay and faster app loading times on the Poco X3 Pro.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging (59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min) is significantly faster than the vivo Y72 5G’s 18W charging. This faster charging capability is a major advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery, reducing downtime and increasing convenience. While both offer all-day battery life, the Poco X3 Pro minimizes charging interruptions.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y72 5G if you need a reliable 5G phone for daily tasks, streaming, and casual photography, and value a balanced experience over peak performance. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you're a mobile gamer, frequently edit videos, or need a phone that can handle demanding applications without throttling, and are willing to trade some battery efficiency for that power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 860 in the Poco X3 Pro get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known to generate heat under sustained load. However, the Poco X3 Pro incorporates thermal management solutions, such as a large heat sink, to mitigate throttling. While some warmth is expected, it generally maintains acceptable performance levels during prolonged gaming.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo Y72 5G slow compared to other phones in this price range?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow compared to the 33W or even 65W charging found on many competing devices. It will take considerably longer to fully charge the vivo Y72 5G, potentially requiring overnight charging for a full top-up.
❓ Can the Poco X3 Pro handle graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Poco X3 Pro can run Genshin Impact, but you may need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. The Snapdragon 860 provides enough power to handle the game, but it's not a flagship-level experience.
❓ What 5G bands does the vivo Y72 5G support?
Specific 5G band support for the vivo Y72 5G varies by region. It's crucial to check compatibility with your carrier's 5G network before purchasing to ensure you can take advantage of 5G speeds.
