The vivo Y72 5G and Realme 8 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they prioritize different strengths: the Y72 5G focuses on 5G connectivity with a Mediatek Dimensity 700, while the Realme 8 Pro emphasizes camera capabilities and rapid charging with a Snapdragon 720G.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and significantly faster charging, the Realme 8 Pro is the better choice. Its 50W charging capability dramatically reduces downtime, and while the chipsets are comparable, the Realme's camera system offers a more refined experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 31 | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Graphite Black, Dream Glow | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | V2041 | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 116h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y72 5G
- Affordable 5G connectivity
- Decent CPU performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable battery life
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely less capable camera system
- Potentially less optimized thermal management
Realme 8 Pro
- 50W fast charging – significantly reduces downtime
- Potentially better camera system
- Slightly more efficient chipset (8nm vs 7nm)
- Similar battery life to the Y72 5G despite faster charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- No high refresh rate display
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the Realme 8 Pro's positioning, it likely benefits from a slightly more refined display calibration. The lack of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on battery efficiency over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
The Realme 8 Pro is positioned as a camera-centric device, though specific sensor details are absent. The Realme 8 Pro likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The vivo Y72 5G, while capable, likely prioritizes overall system cost over camera hardware. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either device suggests reliance on electronic image stabilization, which is less effective in low-light conditions. The Realme 8 Pro’s emphasis on photography suggests a more versatile and feature-rich camera experience.
Performance
The Realme 8 Pro's Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm) and the vivo Y72 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) represent similar performance tiers. The Snapdragon 720G, built on an 8nm process, generally offers slightly better sustained performance due to potentially improved thermal management. The Y72 5G’s Dimensity 700, with its Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, provides a strong CPU performance, but the Snapdragon 720G’s Kryo 465 Gold cores at 2.3 GHz offer a slight edge in single-core tasks. Both phones are adequate for everyday tasks and moderate gaming, but demanding titles may require reduced settings.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an endurance rating of 116 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Realme 8 Pro’s 50W wired charging is a game-changer. Achieving 50% charge in 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes significantly reduces downtime compared to the vivo Y72 5G’s slower 18W charging. This difference in charging speed is a major practical advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y72 5G if you need reliable 5G connectivity on a budget and aren't heavily reliant on advanced camera features. It's ideal for users who prioritize network speed for streaming and basic photography. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you prefer a more versatile camera system, significantly faster charging speeds, and a phone geared towards content creation and everyday use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 700 in the vivo Y72 5G struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Dimensity 700 is capable of running these games, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro offers a slight performance advantage, potentially allowing for higher settings, but both phones are best suited for casual gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y72 5G in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Realme 8 Pro can go from 0% to 50% in just 17 minutes, and fully charge in 47 minutes. The vivo Y72 5G, with its 18W charging, will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 1.5 to 2 hours for a full charge. This makes the Realme 8 Pro ideal for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the camera on the Realme 8 Pro significantly better for low-light photography?
While specific sensor details are missing, the Realme 8 Pro’s positioning as a camera-focused phone suggests better low-light performance. It likely employs more advanced image processing algorithms to reduce noise and improve detail in challenging lighting conditions. The lack of OIS on either device means electronic image stabilization will be relied upon, which is less effective in low light.
