OnePlus Nord 2 5G vs. vivo Y72 5G: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 1200 chipset delivers substantially faster performance, and the 65W charging is a game-changer, fully charging the device in just 30 minutes. While the Y72 5G offers a more affordable entry into 5G, it compromises significantly on speed and convenience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y72 5G | OnePlus Nord 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 31 | Available. Released 2021, July 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, SBAS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Black, Dream Glow | Gray Sierra, Blue Haze, Green Wood, Pac-Man Edition |
| Models | V2041 | DN2101, DN2103 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 189.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 148.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 512164 (v8) | 598022 (v9) GeekBench: 2792 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y72 5G
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery endurance
- Significantly slower processor
- Slow 18W charging
- Limited display details
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
- Much faster Dimensity 1200 processor
- Ultra-fast 65W charging (30 min full charge)
- Brighter display
- Higher price tag
- Camera details are limited
- No expandable storage (likely)
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured 633 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y72 5G. While both are likely LCD panels given the market segment, the higher peak brightness of the Nord 2 translates to better visibility outdoors. The Nord 2’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a standard LCD contrast ratio, while the Y72 5G’s display specifications are not provided. The lack of detailed display information for the Y72 5G suggests a more basic panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Nord 2’s positioning suggests a more sophisticated camera system. The Y72 5G likely relies on a more basic image processing pipeline, while the Nord 2 benefits from the Dimensity 1200’s enhanced ISP (Image Signal Processor). The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either phone suggests neither prioritizes advanced stabilization.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The OnePlus Nord 2 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) features a more advanced CPU configuration – a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the vivo Y72 5G’s Dimensity 700 (7nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. The Dimensity 1200’s higher clock speeds and more powerful core configuration deliver significantly faster processing and graphics performance. The 6nm process node further enhances efficiency, potentially leading to better thermal management under sustained load. The Y72 5G will handle everyday tasks, but the Nord 2 is the clear winner for gaming and demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 102 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing charging capabilities. However, the charging experience is where they diverge dramatically. The vivo Y72 5G is limited to 18W wired charging, while the OnePlus Nord 2 5G supports 65W wired charging with PD (Power Delivery), achieving a full charge in just 30 minutes. This difference in charging speed is a significant convenience factor, making the Nord 2 far more practical for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y72 5G if you prioritize affordability and basic 5G connectivity without demanding performance for gaming or intensive tasks. It’s a solid option for users primarily focused on calls, texts, and light social media. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2 5G if you value speed, responsiveness, and a premium charging experience. This phone is ideal for gamers, content creators, and anyone who wants a smooth, future-proofed device.