vivo Y72 5G vs Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: A Detailed 5G Budget Phone Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a slightly brighter display, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 765 chipset provides a small but noticeable edge in CPU and GPU performance, and the 543 nits of peak brightness offers a more usable outdoor experience. However, the vivo Y72 5G remains a compelling option for those seeking a streamlined software experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y72 5G | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, March 22 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, March 31 | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Graphite Black, Dream Glow | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | V2041 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | - | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y72 5G
- Clean and streamlined software experience
- Competitive 5G connectivity with Dimensity 700
- Potentially lower price point
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Potentially less powerful chipset for demanding tasks
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- Brighter display (543 nits)
- More powerful Snapdragon 765 chipset
- Excellent battery endurance (114h rating)
- Faster 20W charging
- Motorola’s software can include bloatware
- Potentially higher price compared to the Y72 5G
Display Comparison
Both devices share a contrast ratio of 1269:1, indicating similar levels of black depth and color vibrancy. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 543 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, where the Y72 5G’s unspecified brightness will likely struggle. While both likely utilize LCD panels given the price point, the Moto G 5G Plus’s higher brightness provides a more comfortable viewing experience in various lighting conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus’s history suggests a focus on computational photography, potentially leading to more refined image processing. The inclusion of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Moto G 5G Plus, if present, would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording. The Y72 5G’s camera performance will likely rely more heavily on software optimization.
Performance
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus’s Snapdragon 765 5G chipset features a Kryo 475 Prime core clocked at 2.3 GHz, offering a slight advantage over the vivo Y72 5G’s Dimensity 700, which tops out at 2.2 GHz with its Cortex-A76 cores. The Snapdragon 765 also benefits from a more sophisticated core arrangement (1+1+6) compared to the Dimensity 700’s (2+6), potentially improving multi-tasking efficiency. Both chipsets are fabricated on a 7nm process, but Qualcomm’s architecture generally delivers better sustained performance under load. The Y72 5G’s Dimensity 700 is still capable, but the Moto G 5G Plus has a clear edge for demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the exact battery capacity isn’t specified, this rating suggests efficient power management. The vivo Y72 5G features 18W wired charging, while the Moto G 5G Plus steps it up to 20W. This 2W difference, while seemingly small, can translate to a slightly faster 0-100% charge time. Given the Moto G 5G Plus’s superior endurance, the faster charging is a welcome addition.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y72 5G if you prioritize a clean, uncluttered software experience and are comfortable with potentially slightly lower peak performance. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you value a brighter display, a more powerful chipset for multitasking and gaming, and a proven track record of battery endurance, as evidenced by its 114-hour endurance rating.