Both the vivo Y72 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G target the burgeoning 5G smartphone market in India, but they approach it with different philosophies. The Y72 5G prioritizes affordability, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G aims for a more premium experience with faster charging and a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 695 and, crucially, its 67W charging significantly outperform the vivo Y72 5G's Snapdragon 480 and 18W charging, making it a more future-proof and user-friendly option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 15 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g (6.56 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10, 460 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Magic, Slate Grey | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | V2060 | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| SAR | 1.04 W/kg (head) | - |
vivo Y72 5G (India)
- More affordable price point
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Slow 18W charging
- Less powerful Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Likely less refined camera experience
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- More powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially better camera performance
- Supports PD3.0 and QC3
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y72 5G
- May be overkill for basic smartphone users
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature LCD panels (data not provided), the core difference lies in performance. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695, built on a 6nm process, offers a more efficient architecture than the Y72 5G’s Snapdragon 480 (8nm). This translates to better sustained performance and potentially lower heat generation during prolonged use. The 6nm node allows for a higher transistor density, improving efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s positioning suggests a more sophisticated camera system. The Snapdragon 695 ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more capable than the 480’s, potentially leading to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While both phones likely include standard features like HDR, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G likely benefits from more advanced computational photography algorithms.
Performance
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G represents a significant step up in processing power compared to the vivo Y72 5G’s Snapdragon 480 5G. The 695 features Kryo 660 Gold and Silver cores clocked at up to 2.2 GHz, versus the 480’s Kryo 460 cores peaking at 2.0 GHz. This difference in core architecture and clock speed will be noticeable in app loading times, multitasking, and gaming. The 6nm process further enhances the 695’s efficiency, reducing thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. Claimed 0-100% in 42 minutes is drastically faster than the vivo Y72 5G’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed significantly reduces downtime. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G also supports PD3.0 and QC3, offering wider compatibility with chargers. The Snapdragon 695’s 6nm efficiency also contributes to better battery life compared to the Snapdragon 480’s 8nm process.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y72 5G (India) if you need a functional 5G smartphone on a very tight budget and aren't concerned with demanding tasks or rapid charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prefer a smoother experience, faster charging speeds, and a chipset capable of handling more intensive applications and gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G handle demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to adjust graphics settings to medium or low for a consistently smooth experience. The 6nm process and improved CPU/GPU architecture offer a noticeable advantage over the Snapdragon 480 in the Y72 5G, resulting in fewer frame drops and better sustained performance.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y72 5G in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is dramatically faster. Xiaomi claims a full charge in 42 minutes, while the vivo Y72 5G will likely take well over two hours with its 18W charger. This means you can quickly top up your phone during short breaks, making it much more convenient for users who are always on the go.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G experience significant overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 695’s 6nm process is more efficient than the Snapdragon 480’s 8nm process, leading to lower heat generation. While some warming is inevitable during intensive gaming, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is less likely to experience significant throttling compared to the Y72 5G.
