The sub-$200 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y72 5G (India) and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches. The Y72 5G prioritizes a streamlined experience with a Snapdragon 480, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G steps up the performance with a Snapdragon 695 and a focus on rapid charging.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better buy. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Y72 5G’s Snapdragon 480, and the 67W charging is a game-changer, fully charging the device in just 41 minutes compared to the Y72’s slower 18W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 15 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g (6.56 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10, 460 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Magic, Slate Grey | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | V2060 | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | 1.04 W/kg (head) | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y72 5G (India)
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Clean and simple user experience (typical of vivo).
- Reliable 5G connectivity.
- Significantly weaker processor performance.
- Slow 18W charging.
- Limited display information.
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 695 processor.
- Ultra-fast 67W charging.
- Likely better camera performance.
- Xiaomi’s MIUI can be feature-rich but also bloated.
- Potentially slightly higher price.
- No detailed display specs available.
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for the Y72 5G. The Poco X4 Pro 5G, while also lacking detailed specs, benefits from Xiaomi’s generally strong display calibration in this price segment. Without specific data on the Y72 5G, it’s difficult to assess its display quality relative to the Poco, but the X4 Pro likely offers a more vibrant and potentially brighter viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are scarce. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the Poco X4 Pro 5G, given Xiaomi’s camera-focused marketing, likely benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Y72 5G, while capable, is likely to offer a more basic camera experience. It's reasonable to assume the Poco X4 Pro 5G will deliver better low-light performance and more detailed images.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) is a significant step up from the vivo Y72 5G’s Snapdragon 480 (8nm). The 6nm process node of the 695 translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance, allowing for sustained performance during longer gaming sessions. The CPU configuration further highlights this: the Poco boasts 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores and 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver cores, compared to the Y72’s 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Poco X4 Pro 5G.
Battery Life
Both devices have an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The vivo Y72 5G is limited to 18W wired charging, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC3.0. This means the Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes – a massive advantage for users who value quick top-ups. The faster charging effectively mitigates any potential battery life differences.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y72 5G (India) if you prioritize a simple, reliable 5G experience and are less concerned with demanding tasks or fast charging. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want a more capable processor for gaming and multitasking, and if minimizing downtime with incredibly fast 67W charging is a key requirement.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G capable of handling demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is a capable chipset for gaming at medium settings. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it can comfortably run popular titles like PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at 60fps with optimized graphics settings. The improved thermal efficiency of the 6nm process also helps prevent throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y72 5G in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can go from 0% to 70% in just 22 minutes and fully charge in 41 minutes. The vivo Y72 5G, with its 18W charging, will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 1.5 to 2 hours for a full charge. This makes the Poco X4 Pro 5G ideal for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Does the Poco X4 Pro 5G support VoWiFi (Wi-Fi Calling)?
Support for VoWiFi varies by region and carrier. While the Poco X4 Pro 5G hardware is capable, you'll need to check with your mobile carrier to confirm if they support VoWiFi on this specific device in your area.
