The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G and the vivo Y72 5G both target the burgeoning Indian 5G market, but they approach it from different angles. The M52 aims for a more premium experience with a powerful chipset, while the Y72 5G focuses on affordability. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and display quality, the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Y72 5G’s Snapdragon 480, and its brighter display enhances the viewing experience. The Y72 5G remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, July 15 | 2021, September 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, July 15 | Available. Released 2021, October 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.4 x 7.4 mm (6.46 x 3.01 x 0.29 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g (6.56 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10, 460 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED Plus, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7um, PDAF
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Prism Magic, Slate Grey | Icy Blue, Blazing Black, White |
| Models | V2060 | SM-M526BR, SM-M526BR/DS, SM-M526B, SM-M526B/DS |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | 1.04 W/kg (head) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) 1.40 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-30.0 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 504424 (v9)
GeekBench: 2796 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y72 5G (India)
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 778G processor
- Brighter and more vibrant display (777 nits)
- Faster 25W wired charging
- Likely superior camera performance
- Potentially higher price point
- May be slightly larger and heavier
Samsung Galaxy M52 5G
- More affordable price
- Decent battery life (123h endurance)
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Lightweight design (likely)
- Slower Snapdragon 480 processor
- Less bright display
- Slower 18W charging
- Basic camera system
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 777 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y72 5G. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels), the M52’s superior brightness is a tangible advantage. The Y72 5G’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more basic panel likely optimized for power efficiency rather than visual fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The Samsung Galaxy M52 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing algorithms and potentially a larger main sensor (though sensor size is unspecified). The vivo Y72 5G’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on providing acceptable results in good lighting conditions. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on the Y72 5G is a common, but often underwhelming, feature. Without detailed sensor specifications, the M52 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality and more versatile shooting options.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm), while the vivo Y72 5G is equipped with the SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm). The 778G’s Cortex-A78 prime core (2.4 GHz) and more efficient 6nm process deliver substantially higher CPU and GPU performance. The Y72 5G’s Kryo 460 cores, while adequate for basic tasks, will struggle with demanding games and multitasking. The 778G’s Adreno 642L GPU is a significant upgrade over the 480’s Adreno 619, offering a smoother gaming experience. The M52’s likely use of faster LPDDR5 RAM (though not explicitly stated) further enhances performance.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 123 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the M52’s more powerful chipset. However, the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G offers significantly faster 25W wired charging compared to the Y72 5G’s 18W charging. This means the M52 5G can replenish its battery much quicker, minimizing downtime. While both batteries are likely around the 5000mAh mark (based on market trends), the faster charging speed gives the M52 a practical advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y72 5G (India) if you need a functional 5G smartphone with basic capabilities and a lower price point is your absolute priority. Buy the Samsung Galaxy M52 5G if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and content consumption, and are willing to spend a bit more for a superior display and faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Galaxy M52 5G get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is known for its efficiency. While it will generate heat during extended gaming, the 6nm process and Samsung’s thermal management should prevent significant throttling, providing a consistently smooth experience. The Y72 5G’s Snapdragon 480 will likely throttle sooner under similar load.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo Y72 5G slow compared to other phones?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow compared to the 25W charging on the Galaxy M52 5G and many other modern smartphones. Expect a longer recharge time – potentially over 2 hours for a full charge from 0%.
❓ How does the camera performance of the Galaxy M52 5G compare in low-light conditions?
The Galaxy M52 5G is expected to perform better in low-light conditions due to the superior image processing capabilities of the Snapdragon 778G’s ISP and potentially a larger sensor. Expect less noise and more detail in nighttime photos compared to the Y72 5G.
❓ Will the Snapdragon 480 in the vivo Y72 5G struggle with demanding apps like video editing software?
Yes, the Snapdragon 480 is a budget-oriented chipset and will likely struggle with resource-intensive tasks like video editing. Expect longer processing times and potential lag when using such applications.
