vivo Y72 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A22 5G: A Head-to-Head Comparison

The budget 5G smartphone market is booming, offering incredible value for money. Two contenders vying for your attention are the vivo Y72 5G (India) and the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. Both promise 5G connectivity and a decent experience, but which one truly delivers? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.

Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G edges out the vivo Y72 5G thanks to its slightly more powerful chipset, better charging speed (despite both being slow), and Samsung's generally reliable software support. However, the vivo Y72 5G offers a more modern design and potentially better software experience depending on updates.

PHONES
Phone Names	vivo Y72 5G (India)	Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

Network
2G bands	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900	GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bands	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100	HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands	1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41	1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41
5G bands	78 SA/NSA	1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6
Speed	HSPA, LTE, 5G	HSPA, LTE, 5G
Technology	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G	GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G

Launch
Announced	2021, July 15	2021, June 03
Status	Available. Released 2021, July 15	Available. Released 2021, June 24

Body
Build	-	Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back
Dimensions	164.2 x 75.4 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in)	167.2 x 76.4 x 9 mm (6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIM	Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM	· Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight	185.5 g (6.56 oz)	203 g (7.16 oz)

Display
Resolution	1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density)	1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density)
Size	6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio)	6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~82.3% screen-to-body ratio)
Type	IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10, 460 nits (typ)	TFT LCD, 90Hz

Platform
CPU	Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)	Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
Chipset	Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm)	Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)
GPU	Adreno 619	Mali-G57 MC2
OS	Android 11, Funtouch 11.1	Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI core 5

Memory
Card slot	No	microSDXC (dedicated slot)
Internal	128GB 8GB RAM	64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM

Main Camera
Dual	48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lens	-
Features	LED flash, HDR, panorama	LED flash, panorama, HDR
Single	8 MP, f/1.8, (wide)	8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Triple	-	48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF 5 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lens
Video	1080p@30fps	1152p@30fps

Selfie camera
Features	HDR	-
Single	8 MP, f/1.8, (wide)	8 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
Video	1080p@30fps	1080p@30fps

Sound
3.5mm jack	Yes	Yes
35mm jack	Yes	Yes
Loudspeaker	Yes	Yes

Comms
Bluetooth	5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD	5.0, A2DP, LE
NFC	No	Yes (market/region dependent)
Positioning	GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO	GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
Radio	No	FM radio
USB	USB Type-C 2.0, OTG	USB Type-C 2.0
WLAN	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct	Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct

Features
Sensors	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass	Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass

Battery
Charging	18W wired	15W wired
Type	5000 mAh	Li-Po 5000 mAh

Misc
Colors	Prism Magic, Slate Grey	Gray, White, Mint, Violet
Models	V2060	SM-A226B, SM-A226B/DS, SM-A226B/DSN, SM-A226BR, SM-A226BR/N, SM-A226L, SC-56B
Price	About 240 EUR	£ 92.00 / € 125.99
SAR	1.04 W/kg (head)	-
SAR EU	-	0.73 W/kg (head) 1.23 W/kg (body)

Tests
Battery life	-	Endurance rating 118h
Camera	-	Photo / Video
Display	-	Contrast ratio: 1631:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker	-	-28.5 LUFS (Average)
Performance	-	AnTuTu: 242155 (v8), 223188 (v9) GeekBench: 6913 (v4.4), 1719 (v5.1) GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

vivo Y72 5G (India)

Sleek and modern design
Potentially cleaner Android experience
5G connectivity

Slower chipset compared to A22 5G
Slow charging speed
Less established brand reputation in some markets

Samsung Galaxy A22 5G

More powerful Dimensity 700 chipset
Excellent battery life (118h endurance)
Samsung's reliable software support
Slightly brighter display

Design may be less appealing to some
Slow charging speed
Samsung's One UI can be resource-intensive

Display Comparison

Both phones feature similar contrast ratios (1631:1), but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 385 nits, which is slightly better than what's typically expected from the vivo Y72 5G. Screen size and resolution are likely comparable, offering a decent viewing experience for media consumption. The A22 5G might offer slightly better outdoor visibility.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is subjective and depends on individual preferences. Both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed camera specs are missing. Generally, Samsung's image processing tends to be more saturated and vibrant, while vivo often aims for a more natural look. Real-world testing would be needed to determine a clear winner.

Performance

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm) chipset holds a clear advantage over the vivo Y72 5G's Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm). The Dimensity 700's Cortex-A76 cores provide a noticeable boost in performance for demanding tasks and gaming. While both are octa-core processors, the A22 5G offers a smoother and more responsive experience overall.

Battery Life

The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G claims an impressive endurance rating of 118 hours, suggesting exceptional battery life. While this is a standardized test, it indicates a significant advantage over the vivo Y72 5G. Both phones feature 18W/15W wired charging, which is relatively slow by modern standards.

Buying Guide

Who should buy the vivo Y72 5G (India)? Users prioritizing a sleek design and a potentially cleaner Android experience might lean towards the vivo. Who should buy the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G? Those seeking a slightly more powerful processor and the reliability of the Samsung ecosystem will find the A22 5G a better fit.