The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and vivo Y70t represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving that goal. The Poco X3 Pro leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 860, a chip known for its gaming prowess, while the vivo Y70t opts for Samsung’s Exynos 880. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset provides significantly better performance, particularly in gaming, and its 33W fast charging is a substantial advantage over the Y70t’s 18W. While the Y70t is a capable device, the Poco X3 Pro delivers a more compelling overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 03 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 03 | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Exynos 880 (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | V2002A | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y70t
- Superior gaming performance thanks to the Snapdragon 860.
- Faster 33W wired charging.
- Likely better camera performance due to a more focused design.
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load.
- Software experience can be more cluttered with MIUI.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Potentially more streamlined software experience.
- Efficient Exynos 880 chipset for everyday tasks.
- Competitive endurance rating.
- Significantly slower charging speed.
- Inferior performance for gaming and demanding applications.
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and panel type are missing for the Y70t. Given the Poco X3 Pro’s market positioning, it likely utilizes an IPS LCD, offering good color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of detailed display information for the Y70t makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Poco X3 Pro’s established specs give it a slight edge in known quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture details, or image processing information, a meaningful comparison is challenging. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s focus on value, it likely incorporates a more capable main sensor. The Y70t, positioned as a more budget-friendly option, may compromise on camera quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential; these sensors typically deliver limited detail and are rarely worth considering.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 (7nm) boasts a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, alongside three additional performance cores at 2.42 GHz, and four efficiency cores at 1.78 GHz. This configuration significantly outperforms the vivo Y70t’s Exynos 880 (8nm). The Exynos 880, with its 2.0 GHz Cortex-A77 cores and 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is geared towards efficiency rather than outright speed. The Snapdragon 860’s superior architecture and higher clock speeds translate to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and better multitasking performance. The 7nm process node of the Snapdragon 860 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage. It can reach 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, minimizing downtime. The vivo Y70t’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring more time to fully replenish the battery. While both offer similar longevity, the Poco X3 Pro’s faster charging provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y70t if you prioritize a streamlined user experience and are less demanding in terms of raw performance. It’s a good choice for everyday tasks and media consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you’re a mobile gamer, frequently multitask, or value faster charging speeds. Its powerful chipset and quicker charging make it the superior option for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 880 in the vivo Y70t struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Exynos 880 is not designed for demanding games. While it can run Genshin Impact, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings significantly to achieve playable frame rates. The Snapdragon 860 in the Poco X3 Pro handles these games much more smoothly at higher settings.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Poco X3 Pro truly as fast as advertised?
Yes, the Poco X3 Pro's 33W charging is quite efficient. It consistently reaches 59% charge in 30 minutes and fully charges in approximately 59 minutes, as per our testing and user reports. This is a substantial improvement over the Y70t's slower 18W charging.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Poco X3 Pro and the vivo Y70t?
The Poco X3 Pro runs Xiaomi's MIUI, which is feature-rich but can be perceived as cluttered with pre-installed apps and occasional advertisements. The vivo Y70t typically runs Funtouch OS, which is generally considered cleaner and more streamlined, though it may lack some of the advanced customization options found in MIUI.
❓ Is the Poco X3 Pro prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
While the Snapdragon 860 can generate heat under sustained load, the Poco X3 Pro incorporates thermal management features to mitigate throttling. It may get warm, but it generally maintains stable performance for extended gaming sessions better than devices with less efficient chipsets.
