The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, a well-established player, faces off against the vivo Y70t, a device aiming to disrupt with a focus on value. This comparison dives deep into the specifications and real-world implications of each phone, helping you determine which best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers significantly better performance, and the 25W charging is a welcome upgrade. While the Y70t offers a lower price point, the performance trade-offs are substantial.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 03 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 03 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 880 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | V2002A | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 190 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y70t
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 778G
- Faster 25W charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially higher price
- May not offer expandable storage (depending on region)
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life (113h endurance)
- 5G connectivity
- Significantly weaker performance with Exynos 880
- Slower 18W charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y70t. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' contrast ratio (typical for AMOLED panels), the A52s 5G’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Details regarding the Y70t’s panel technology (e.g., PWM dimming rate) are missing, but Samsung’s displays are generally well-regarded for color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally more sophisticated, often resulting in more vibrant and detailed photos. The A52s 5G likely benefits from better software optimization for its camera system. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A52s 5G (a common feature in Samsung’s A-series) would provide a significant advantage in low-light photography and video recording, a feature not confirmed on the Y70t. The usefulness of the 2MP macro camera on either device is questionable, as image quality is typically limited.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm), featuring a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core and 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores, alongside 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. The vivo Y70t, conversely, is powered by the Exynos 880 (8 nm) with a 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A77 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The Snapdragon 778G’s newer architecture and 6nm process node provide a significant performance advantage in both CPU and GPU-intensive tasks. The A78 cores in the Snapdragon 778G are also more efficient than the A77 cores in the Exynos 880, leading to better sustained performance and potentially improved thermal management. The Snapdragon 778G is demonstrably better suited for gaming and demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging is considerably faster than the vivo Y70t’s 18W charging. This means the A52s 5G can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed gives the A52s 5G a practical advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y70t if you prioritize absolute affordability and basic smartphone functionality, and are willing to compromise on processing power for everyday tasks. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, faster charging, and a more refined overall experience, even at a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 880 in the vivo Y70t struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Exynos 880 is significantly less powerful than the Snapdragon 778G. While it can run these games, you'll likely need to lower graphics settings to achieve a playable frame rate, and may experience occasional stuttering or lag. The Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G offers a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y70t?
The 25W charging on the A52s 5G will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times depend on various factors, you can expect the A52s 5G to charge considerably faster, potentially shaving off 30-60 minutes compared to the Y70t. This is a substantial benefit for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the camera on the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G noticeably better for low-light photography?
Likely, yes. Samsung's A-series phones often include features like OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) which helps reduce blur in low-light conditions. Combined with Samsung's image processing algorithms, the A52s 5G should produce clearer and more detailed photos in dimly lit environments compared to the Y70t.
