vivo Y70t vs. Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025): A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Exynos 880, coupled with a dramatically faster 68W charging system and a brighter, more modern display. While the Y70t offers a lower entry price, the Motorola’s improvements justify the cost.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y70t | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | 1, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 70, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 03 | 2025, April 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 03 | Available. Released 2025, April 17 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), silicone polymer (eco leather) back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162 x 76.6 x 8.5 mm (6.38 x 3.02 x 0.33 in) | 162.2 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm (6.39 x 2.94 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~444 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A77 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Exynos 880 (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM6475-AB Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 15, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers (with Dolby Atmos) |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 68W wired 15W wireless |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Pantone: Gibraltar sea, Surf the Web |
| Models | V2002A | XT2517-1 |
| Price | About 190 EUR | $ 299.99 / C$ 368.17 |
vivo Y70t
- Potentially lower price point
- Compact and lightweight design (assumed)
- Reliable brand reputation
- Older Exynos 880 chipset
- Slow 18W charging
- Likely dimmer display
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025)
- Faster Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset
- 68W wired and 15W wireless charging
- Bright 1870 nit display
- Integrated stylus functionality
- Potentially higher price
- Larger form factor (likely)
- Software update commitment may be shorter than vivo
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1870 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the Y70t, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Y70t’s panel specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be considerably dimmer. The Motorola’s brightness also suggests a more modern panel technology, potentially with better color accuracy and viewing angles. The inclusion of a stylus also adds a unique dimension to the display’s functionality, catering to note-takers and creative users.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo Y70t, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Motorola’s likely focus on computational photography, leveraging the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3’s ISP, will likely yield better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding OIS or sensor size on the Y70t suggests a more basic camera experience. We can assume the Motorola will offer more refined image processing and potentially better video recording capabilities. The Y70t’s inclusion of a 2MP macro camera is likely a marketing feature with limited real-world utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 (4nm) is built on a more advanced manufacturing process than the vivo Y70t’s Exynos 880 (8nm). This 4nm process translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, meaning the Motorola will likely sustain peak performance for longer periods. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 3’s CPU configuration – 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – also represents a step up in individual core performance compared to the Y70t’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A77 cores. This will be noticeable in demanding applications and multitasking scenarios. While both use Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the overall architecture favors the Motorola.
Battery Life
The Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) excels in battery technology. While the Y70t offers only 18W wired charging, the Motorola supports a blazing-fast 68W wired charging, significantly reducing charge times. The addition of 15W wireless charging on the Motorola provides further convenience. The Motorola’s active use score of 10:05h demonstrates excellent battery life, likely due to the efficiency of the Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 chipset. While the Y70t’s battery capacity is unknown, the slower charging speed suggests it will take considerably longer to replenish.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y70t if you prioritize absolute affordability and are willing to compromise on processing power and charging speed. It’s a solid option for basic smartphone tasks and light usage. Buy the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2025) if you value a smoother user experience, faster charging, a brighter display, and a more future-proof chipset, even if it means spending a bit more upfront.