The vivo Y70 and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Y70 prioritizes affordability and a streamlined experience, while the Poco X3 Pro aims for near-flagship performance at a mid-range price. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing smooth gaming and demanding applications, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset delivers significantly superior performance compared to the vivo Y70’s Snapdragon 665. However, the Y70 remains a viable option for basic tasks and users on a very tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 19. Released 2020, October 19 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 65% in 30 min | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 4100 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gravity Black, Oxygen Blue | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | - | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 270 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y70
- More affordable price point
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to the less powerful chipset
- Streamlined user experience for basic tasks
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X3 Pro
- Limited gaming capabilities
- Missing detailed display specifications
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- Superior performance with the Snapdragon 860
- Excellent gaming capabilities
- Faster charging speed to full capacity
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y70
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- Larger size may not appeal to all users
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like resolution, refresh rate, and peak brightness are missing for the Y70. The Poco X3 Pro, while not boasting cutting-edge panel technology, benefits from a larger display size commonly found in its segment, offering a more immersive viewing experience. Without further data on the Y70’s panel, it’s difficult to assess its color accuracy or outdoor visibility compared to the X3 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. The absence of sensor size or aperture information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, given the Poco X3 Pro’s positioning as a gaming-focused device, it’s likely to have a more capable camera system optimized for social media sharing and casual photography. The Y70 likely focuses on basic image capture, and any included 'macro' lenses are likely to be of low resolution and limited utility.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y70’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 860 features a Kryo 485 core configuration with a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, compared to the Y70’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. This translates to a dramatically faster CPU and GPU, making the Poco X3 Pro far more capable in gaming and resource-intensive applications. The 7nm process node also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended use.
Battery Life
Both devices offer 33W wired charging, with the Poco X3 Pro reaching 59% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 59 minutes, while the Y70 achieves 65% in 30 minutes. The Poco X3 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating solid battery life. While the Y70’s battery capacity is unknown, the Snapdragon 665’s lower power consumption might partially offset the difference. The faster full charge time of the Poco X3 Pro is a practical advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y70 if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing, and prioritize a lower price point above all else. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prefer a device capable of handling demanding mobile games, multitasking, and benefit from a more powerful processor for future-proofing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro’s Snapdragon 860 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known for its strong performance and relatively good thermal management. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, the 7nm process node and the Poco X3 Pro’s cooling system are designed to mitigate throttling and maintain stable performance for extended periods. However, sustained peak performance will still generate heat.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the vivo Y70 fast enough for daily use?
While 33W charging is respectable, the Y70 only reaches 65% charge in 30 minutes, compared to the Poco X3 Pro’s 59%. This means you’ll need to dedicate more time to fully charging the device. For casual users, this may not be a significant issue, but power users will likely prefer the faster charging of the Poco X3 Pro.
❓ Can the vivo Y70 handle popular mobile games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Snapdragon 665 in the vivo Y70 can *run* PUBG and Call of Duty, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a playable experience. Expect noticeable lag and stuttering, especially in demanding scenarios. The Poco X3 Pro, with its Snapdragon 860, will provide a significantly smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.
