The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y70 and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. However, they target slightly different priorities. The Y70 focuses on affordability, while the A52s 5G aims for a balance of features and performance, leveraging the more powerful Snapdragon 778G chipset.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers significantly faster performance, making it better suited for gaming and demanding applications. While the Y70 offers a lower price point, the A52s 5G’s improved processing power and comparable battery life justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 19. Released 2020, October 19 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 65% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4100 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gravity Black, Oxygen Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 270 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y70
- More affordable price point
- Faster initial charging speed (33W)
- Potentially lighter weight (due to simpler components)
- Significantly weaker processor (Snapdragon 665)
- Less future-proof due to older chipset
- Likely inferior camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Much faster processor (Snapdragon 778G)
- Brighter and potentially higher-quality display
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Slightly slower charging speed (25W)
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y70
- Potentially heavier build
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y70. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays likely utilize AMOLED technology (typical for Samsung’s A-series), the A52s 5G’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Y70’s display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more basic panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details are limited. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing algorithms and potentially a larger sensor, though specific sensor sizes aren’t provided. The Y70’s camera system is likely more basic, focusing on providing acceptable image quality in good lighting conditions. Without detailed specifications, it’s difficult to assess the low-light performance or video recording capabilities of either device. We can assume the A52s 5G will offer a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Snapdragon 778G (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the vivo Y70’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores – compared to the Y70’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver configuration. The 6nm process node of the 778G also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This means the A52s 5G will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an Endurance rating of 113 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ. The vivo Y70 supports 33W wired charging, claiming 65% charge in 30 minutes, while the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G offers 25W charging. While the Y70 charges faster initially, the A52s 5G’s more efficient chipset may contribute to longer real-world usage on a single charge. The comparable endurance ratings suggest that battery capacity is similar, despite not being explicitly stated for the Y70.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y70 if you prioritize extreme affordability and basic smartphone functionality – calls, texts, and light social media use. It’s a good option for first-time smartphone users or those on a very tight budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value a smoother user experience, better gaming performance, and a more future-proof device thanks to its 5G connectivity and more capable processor. It’s ideal for users who multitask, play mobile games, or want a phone that will remain responsive for years to come.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 778G is a capable chipset for gaming. It can handle Genshin Impact at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. The 6nm process and improved CPU/GPU architecture provide a smoother gaming experience compared to the Snapdragon 665 in the Y70.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G experience significant overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is relatively efficient, and the A52s 5G generally manages thermal throttling well. While some warming is expected during extended gaming, it shouldn't lead to severe performance drops. Samsung's cooling solutions help mitigate heat buildup.
❓ How does the camera on the vivo Y70 perform in low-light conditions?
Given the Y70's focus on affordability, its low-light camera performance is likely to be average. Expect noticeable noise and a lack of detail in dimly lit environments. The A52s 5G, with its more advanced chipset and potentially larger sensor, will offer significantly better low-light photography.
❓ What type of charging protocol does the vivo Y70 use, and is a fast charger included in the box?
The vivo Y70 supports 33W wired charging. While the specific protocol isn't detailed, it likely uses a proprietary vivo charging standard. A compatible charger is typically included in the box, but it's always best to confirm with the retailer.
