Oppo Reno 5G vs vivo Y70: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing performance and 5G connectivity, the Oppo Reno 5G is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 855 offers a substantial performance uplift over the Y70’s Snapdragon 665. However, the vivo Y70 provides excellent value for budget-conscious buyers who don't require flagship-level processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y70 | Oppo Reno 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 19. Released 2020, October 19 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 11 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 65% in 30 min | 20W wired |
| Type | 4100 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Gravity Black, Oxygen Blue | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | - | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 880 EUR |
vivo Y70
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- 5G connectivity for future-proof networking
- Potentially better camera system
- Slower charging speed compared to vivo Y70
- Potentially lower battery life due to less efficient chipset
- Likely higher price point
Oppo Reno 5G
- Faster 33W charging for quick top-ups
- More power-efficient processor for longer battery life
- More affordable price point
- Significantly slower processor for demanding tasks
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Potentially lower camera quality
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Reno 5G's positioning, it likely features a higher-quality panel with potentially better color accuracy and brightness. The Y70, being a more budget-oriented device, likely utilizes a standard LCD panel. The Reno 5G's potential for a higher refresh rate (though unconfirmed) would also contribute to a smoother user experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Reno 5G, being a higher-tier device, likely incorporates a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS). While both phones likely feature multiple rear cameras, the Reno 5G’s image processing capabilities, powered by the Snapdragon 855’s ISP, will likely result in superior image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The Y70 likely relies on software enhancements to compensate for a less capable sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855, built on a 7nm process, significantly outperforms the vivo Y70’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 855 features a Kryo 485 CPU with a prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, compared to the 665’s 2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores. This translates to approximately a 30-40% performance increase in CPU-intensive tasks and a substantial improvement in GPU performance, making the Reno 5G far more capable for gaming and demanding applications. The 7nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads.
Battery Life
The vivo Y70 boasts 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 65% charge in 30 minutes, a significant advantage over the Oppo Reno 5G’s 20W charging. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed of the Y70 means less downtime. The Snapdragon 855 in the Reno 5G is less power efficient than the 665, potentially leading to shorter battery life despite any capacity differences. The Y70’s efficiency advantage could offset a potentially smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y70 if you need a dependable smartphone for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light multimedia consumption, and your budget is a primary concern. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prioritize smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and the ability to handle more demanding games and applications, and you want access to 5G networks.