The vivo Y70 and Nokia X20 represent distinct approaches to the budget smartphone market. The Y70 focuses on a streamlined experience with faster charging, while the X20 prioritizes 5G connectivity and a more modern chipset. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster data speeds, the Nokia X20 is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 480 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 8nm process, offers a performance edge and 5G support. However, the vivo Y70’s 33W charging is a significant advantage for those who value quick top-ups.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 66, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 19. Released 2020, October 19 | 2021, April 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, May 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 161 x 74.1 x 7.8 mm (6.34 x 2.92 x 0.31 in) | 168.9 x 79.7 x 9.1 mm (6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 171 g (6.03 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~83.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~79.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 11 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
5 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 65% in 30 min | 18W wired |
| Type | 4100 mAh | Li-Po 4470 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gravity Black, Oxygen Blue | Midnight Sun, Nordic Blue |
| Models | - | TA-1341, TA-1344 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.04 W/kg (head) 0.62 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.51 W/kg (head) 1.29 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y70
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Streamlined user experience (typical of vivo)
- Older Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Less efficient 11nm fabrication process
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Nokia X20
- 5G connectivity with Snapdragon 480
- More efficient 8nm fabrication process
- Potentially better long-term software support
- Slower 18W charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Performance gains over the Y70 may not be drastic in everyday tasks
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The lack of specified refresh rates suggests both operate at the standard 60Hz. While detailed display specs are missing, the focus here is on internal components, making display differences less critical. Bezels are likely comparable, typical of budget devices.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera sensor information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests both phones will feature modest camera systems. The absence of any mention of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device indicates reliance on software stabilization. The focus should be on image processing capabilities, which are difficult to assess without sample photos. The Y70 and X20 likely prioritize computational photography to enhance image quality, but the Snapdragon 480 in the X20 may offer a slight edge in processing speed.
Performance
The Nokia X20’s Snapdragon 480 5G, fabricated on an 8nm process, represents a significant architectural leap over the vivo Y70’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 8nm node inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to potentially longer battery life and less thermal throttling under sustained loads. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations, the X20’s Kryo 460 cores offer a more modern design. The Y70’s Kryo 260 cores, while capable, are an older generation. This difference will be most noticeable in demanding applications and multitasking.
Battery Life
The charging speed is a clear differentiator. The vivo Y70’s 33W wired charging can reportedly reach 65% charge in 30 minutes, a substantial advantage over the Nokia X20’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Y70 mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Snapdragon 480’s 8nm efficiency in the X20 could offset the slower charging, but the Y70’s quick top-up capability is a significant convenience factor.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y70 if you need consistently faster charging speeds and are less concerned with 5G connectivity. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day. Buy the Nokia X20 if you prioritize 5G access for faster downloads and streaming, and want a more modern chipset architecture that may offer better long-term software support and efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 480 in the Nokia X20 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 480 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. While not a flagship chipset, its Adreno 619 GPU provides a noticeable improvement over the Adreno 506 in the Snapdragon 665, offering a more playable experience.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the vivo Y70 compared to the 18W charging on the Nokia X20 in real-world use?
The vivo Y70’s 33W charging can add approximately 30-40% battery life in the time it takes the Nokia X20 to add 20-25%. This means a quick 15-20 minute charge on the Y70 can provide a substantial boost, making it ideal for users who need a fast top-up before leaving the house.
❓ Does the Nokia X20 support all 5G bands available in the US?
5G band support varies by region and carrier. It's crucial to check the Nokia X20's specifications on Nokia's website or with your carrier to confirm compatibility with the 5G bands used in your area. The Snapdragon 480 supports a wide range of 5G bands, but not all are activated on every model.
