Looking for an affordable Android phone? The vivo Y69 and Y65 are popular choices in the budget segment. But which one offers the best value? We'll dive deep into their specs, performance, and features to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The vivo Y69 generally edges out the Y65 thanks to its octa-core processor and slightly better performance. However, the Y65 might offer a more refined software experience and potentially better camera optimization depending on specific software versions. Consider your priorities – raw power or a smoother overall experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 41 - Malaysia, Vietnam, Philippines | 1, 3, 5, 41 - Pakistan, Philippines, Bangladesh, Nepal |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8 - Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 - Thailand, Indonesia, Myanmar, Sri Lanka |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2017, August. Released 2017, September | 2017, October. Released 2017, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 154.6 x 75.5 x 7.7 mm (6.09 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 153.6 x 75.8 x 7.5 mm (6.05 x 2.98 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162.8 g (5.75 oz) | 157 g (5.54 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~71.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6750 (28 nm) | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T860MP2 | Adreno 308 |
| OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat), Funtouch 3.2 | Android 7.1 (Nougat), Funtouch 3.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Matte Black | Gold, Matte Black, Rose Gold |
| Models | 1714 | 1719 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 170 EUR |
| SAR | 1.21 W/kg (head) 1.31 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y69
- More powerful processor
- Better multitasking performance
- Potentially slightly better camera hardware
- May have slightly less optimized software
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life due to higher power consumption
vivo Y65
- Potentially better software optimization
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Sleeker design (likely)
- Less powerful processor
- Slower performance
- May struggle with demanding apps
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (IPS LCD) and resolution (likely 720p or similar). The Y69 might have a slightly larger screen size, but the difference is likely minimal. Viewing angles and color accuracy are expected to be adequate for the price range.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is often software-dependent. While the Y69 might have slightly better hardware specs (potentially a higher resolution main sensor), the Y65 could benefit from better image processing algorithms. Both phones likely offer a standard set of camera features like HDR and panorama mode. Low-light performance is expected to be average on both.
Performance
The vivo Y69's octa-core Mediatek MT6750 chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Y65's quad-core Snapdragon 425. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Y69. The Y65 will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature a battery capacity around 3000-4000 mAh. Battery life will depend on usage patterns. The Y69's more powerful processor might consume slightly more power, but the difference is unlikely to be significant. Both should provide a full day of moderate use.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y69 is ideal for users who prioritize performance and multitasking, even on a budget. The vivo Y65 is a good choice for those seeking a more streamlined experience and potentially better camera results, prioritizing software optimization over raw processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The vivo Y69 is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful octa-core processor.
❓ Which phone has a better camera?
While the Y69 might have slightly better camera hardware, the Y65 could offer better image processing and overall camera quality depending on software updates.
❓ Are these phones still available?
Both the vivo Y69 and Y65 are older models and may be difficult to find new. Availability will vary by region and retailer.
