Looking for a reliable and affordable smartphone? The vivo Y69 and Oppo A83 were popular choices in their time. But which one offers the better value? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs and features to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Oppo A83 generally edges out the vivo Y69 thanks to its more efficient chipset and slightly better performance. While both are budget-friendly, the A83's 16nm processor provides a noticeable advantage in everyday use and potentially longer battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - India, Thailand, Pakistan |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 40, 41 - Malaysia, Vietnam, Philippines | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India, Thailand |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8 - Indonesia, Thailand, Pakistan | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Pakistan |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2017, August. Released 2017, September | 2018, January. Released 2018, January |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 154.6 x 75.5 x 7.7 mm (6.09 x 2.97 x 0.30 in) | 150.5 x 73.1 x 7.7 mm (5.93 x 2.88 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 162.8 g (5.75 oz) | 143 g (5.04 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1440 pixels, 18:9 ratio (~282 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.5 inches, 83.4 cm2 (~71.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.7 inches, 83.8 cm2 (~76.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.0 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 2.5 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6750 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6763T Helio P23 (16 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T860MP2 | Mali-G71 MP2 |
| OS | Android 7.0 (Nougat), Funtouch 3.2 | Android 7.1 (Nougat), ColorOS 3.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 16GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 32GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF | 13 MP, f/2.2, AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | Li-Ion 3000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Ion 3180 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Matte Black | Gold, Black, Red, Blue |
| Models | 1714 | CPH1729, CPH1827 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 200 EUR |
| SAR | 1.21 W/kg (head) 1.31 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y69
- Compact design
- Simple user interface
- Decent camera for the price
- Older chipset
- Slower performance
- Smaller front camera
Oppo A83
- More efficient chipset
- Better performance
- Slightly better battery life
- Improved front camera
- Larger bezels compared to newer phones
- HD+ resolution may appear dated
Display Comparison
Both phones feature a 6.0-inch HD+ (720 x 1440) IPS LCD display. While the resolution is similar, the Oppo A83 might offer slightly better color accuracy due to its more modern panel. Viewing angles and brightness are comparable on both devices.
Camera Comparison
The Oppo A83 typically features a 13MP rear camera and a 8MP front camera. The vivo Y69 also has a 13MP rear camera and a 5MP front camera. Image quality is generally comparable, with the A83 potentially offering slightly better low-light performance due to its more advanced image processing. Both cameras are adequate for casual photography.
Performance
This is where the Oppo A83 shines. Its Mediatek MT6763T Helio P23 (16nm) chipset is significantly more efficient than the vivo Y69's MT6750 (28nm). The A83's 2.5 GHz octa-core CPU provides a noticeable performance boost in multitasking and demanding apps. The Y69's 1.5 GHz and 1.0 GHz cores feel slower in comparison.
Battery Life
The Oppo A83 boasts a 3000mAh battery, while the vivo Y69 has a 2930mAh battery. The A83's more efficient chipset translates to better battery life, allowing it to last longer on a single charge.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y69 is a decent option for users prioritizing a simple, straightforward experience and a slightly more compact design. The Oppo A83 is better suited for those seeking a bit more performance and efficiency without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the vivo Y69 still worth buying?
The vivo Y69 is a very budget-friendly option, but the Oppo A83 offers better performance and efficiency for a similar price. It's generally not recommended unless you find a significantly better deal on the Y69.
❓ Which phone has better gaming performance?
The Oppo A83's Helio P23 chipset provides noticeably better gaming performance compared to the vivo Y69's MT6750. Expect smoother gameplay and fewer stutters on the A83.
