The vivo Y5s and Meizu 16Xs represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Y5s relies on MediaTek’s Helio P65, while the 16Xs opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 675. This comparison dives deep into the architectural differences and real-world implications of these chipsets, alongside other key features, to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Meizu 16Xs emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 675, built on an 11nm process, offers a slight edge in efficiency and sustained performance compared to the Y5s’ Helio P65. The 24W charging further enhances the user experience, making it a more practical daily driver.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | CDMA 800 & TD-SCDMA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November. Released 2019, December | 2019, May. Released 2019, June |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.39 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 74.4 x 8.3 mm (5.98 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 165 g (5.82 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2232 pixels, 18.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.2 inches, 95.8 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 460 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM675 Snapdragon 675 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 612 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), Flyme |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 а/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 24W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magnetic Black, Spring White, Blue | Carbon Black, Pearl White, Phantom Blue |
| Models | V1934A | - |
| Price | About 190 EUR | About 220 EUR |
vivo Y5s
- Potentially lower price point
- 5W reverse wired charging
- MediaTek Helio P65 is adequate for basic tasks
- Slower 18W charging
- Helio P65 may struggle with demanding games
- Less efficient chipset compared to Snapdragon 675
Meizu 16Xs
- Faster 24W charging
- Snapdragon 675 offers better performance
- More efficient 11nm process
- Potentially better image processing
- May be slightly more expensive
- Lacks reverse wireless charging
- No significant camera advantages without further specs
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like OLED vs. LCD) are missing, the focus here is on the underlying performance. The difference in chipsets will have a greater impact on perceived smoothness during scrolling and animations than any minor display variations. Bezels are likely comparable given the market segment, and color accuracy is expected to be standard for this price range.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 675 typically supports more advanced image signal processors (ISPs), potentially enabling better image processing capabilities in the Meizu 16Xs. This could manifest as improved dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of information regarding sensor size and lens apertures makes a definitive judgment impossible, but the chipset advantage leans towards the Meizu.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Meizu 16Xs’ Snapdragon 675, fabricated on an 11nm process, generally offers better power efficiency and sustained performance than the vivo Y5s’ 12nm Helio P65. Both utilize an octa-core configuration with 2x2.0 GHz performance cores and 6x1.7 GHz efficiency cores, but Qualcomm’s Kryo cores are architecturally more refined. This translates to a slight advantage for the 16Xs in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Snapdragon 675 also benefits from a more mature software ecosystem and optimized drivers, potentially leading to fewer software-related performance hiccups.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the charging wattage is a clear differentiator. The Meizu 16Xs’ 24W wired charging significantly outperforms the vivo Y5s’ 18W charging. This means faster top-ups and less time tethered to a wall outlet. Even if the Y5s has a slightly larger battery, the 24W charging of the 16Xs will likely result in a more convenient user experience, especially for those who frequently use their phones throughout the day. The Y5s does offer 5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature the 16Xs lacks, but its utility is limited for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y5s if you prioritize a slightly lower initial cost and are comfortable with potentially longer charging times. It’s a suitable choice for users with light to moderate usage patterns, primarily focused on communication and basic app usage. Buy the Meizu 16Xs if you value smoother multitasking, slightly better gaming performance, and the convenience of faster 24W charging. This phone is ideal for users who frequently switch between apps, enjoy mobile gaming, or simply want a more responsive experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 675 in the Meizu 16Xs handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 675 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with reasonable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it offers a noticeable improvement over the Helio P65 in the vivo Y5s, providing smoother gameplay and less stuttering, especially during intense firefights.
❓ How much faster is the 24W charging on the Meizu 16Xs compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y5s?
The 24W charging on the Meizu 16Xs will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times depend on battery capacity (which isn't specified), you can expect a roughly 30-40% faster charging speed with the 16Xs, allowing you to quickly top up your battery during short breaks.
❓ Does the Helio P65 in the vivo Y5s suffer from significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Helio P65 is known to be more prone to thermal throttling than the Snapdragon 675, especially under sustained load. This means that performance may decrease over time during extended gaming sessions as the chip heats up. The Meizu 16Xs, with its more efficient Snapdragon 675, is better equipped to maintain consistent performance for longer periods.
