The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y58 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both devices operate within a similar price bracket, they diverge significantly in their core specifications, particularly in chipset choice and charging capabilities. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which phone delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift, and the groundbreaking 120W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, the vivo Y58 remains a viable option for those seeking a more efficient processor and a potentially longer software support lifecycle.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 20 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 20 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1024 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Himalayan Blue, Sundarbans Green | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | V2355 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y58
- Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 processor
- Potentially longer software support
- Competitive price point
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- Less powerful processor compared to the Redmi
- Likely lower display brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset
- Brighter display (1283 nits)
- Potentially lower battery efficiency
- May run warmer under heavy load
- Xiaomi's MIUI software can be polarizing
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1283 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Y58, whose brightness is not specified but is likely lower given its market positioning. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Redmi’s higher peak brightness and potentially wider color gamut offer a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests a standard 60Hz or 120Hz refresh rate, but the Redmi’s brightness advantage remains a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a higher-resolution main sensor and optical image stabilization (OIS). Xiaomi typically emphasizes camera capabilities in its Pro+ models. The Y58, while likely capable of producing decent images, will likely focus on providing a reliable camera experience rather than pushing the boundaries of mobile photography. The absence of information on lens apertures makes it difficult to assess low-light performance.
Performance
The chipset is where these phones truly diverge. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ leverages the Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, featuring a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 cores compared to the Y58’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance. Both chips are fabricated on a 4nm process, but the Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s newer architecture provides a performance edge. The Y58’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 prioritizes efficiency, potentially offering better battery life during less demanding tasks, but will struggle to match the Redmi’s raw processing power.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s 120W wired charging is its standout feature, capable of fully charging the device in a mere 19 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the Y58’s 44W charging, which will take considerably longer. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 10:38h suggests excellent battery life despite the faster charging. The Y58’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s efficiency may partially offset the charging speed difference, but the convenience of the Redmi’s ultra-fast charging is undeniable.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y58 if you prioritize efficient power consumption and a balanced everyday experience. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset, built on a 4nm process, excels in sustained tasks without overheating. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you demand faster performance for gaming and multitasking, and if minimizing charging time is a top priority. The 120W charging is a game-changer, fully replenishing the battery in under 20 minutes.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7200 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7200 Ultra is a powerful chip, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ incorporates thermal management features to mitigate overheating. However, sustained gaming at maximum settings may still lead to some thermal throttling, which is common in this price segment. The 4nm process helps, but it's not a complete solution.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo Y58 sufficient for daily use, or is it noticeably slow?
44W charging is adequate for overnight charging and topping up throughout the day. However, compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s 120W charging, it is significantly slower. Expect a full charge to take well over an hour, whereas the Redmi can achieve 100% in under 20 minutes.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2's efficiency impact real-world battery life on the vivo Y58?
The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, is designed for power efficiency. This translates to longer battery life during typical usage scenarios like browsing, social media, and calls. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has a strong battery score, the Y58 may last longer on a single charge with moderate use.
