vivo Y58 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Mid-Range Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use score outweigh the Y58’s slightly more efficient chipset. However, the Y58 offers a strong value proposition for those seeking a reliable daily driver.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y58 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, June 20 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, June 20 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1024 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Himalayan Blue, Sundarbans Green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2355 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y58
- Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Reliable Qualcomm platform
- Slower 44W charging
- Likely dimmer display
- Limited camera details
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter 1073 nit display
- Longer battery life (10:28h active use)
- Dimensity 7030 may run warmer under load
- Potentially higher price
- MediaTek software update track record
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for users who frequently use their phones outdoors. While the vivo Y58’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The Edge 40 Neo’s higher brightness translates to better readability in direct sunlight. We can assume both devices utilize AMOLED panels given the market segment, but the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness is a clear differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is marketed with a focus on photo and video capabilities, suggesting a more robust camera system. Without sensor size or aperture information for the vivo Y58, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. The Edge 40 Neo likely benefits from MediaTek’s Imagiq image signal processor, offering advanced features like HDR and noise reduction. We can assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the Edge 40 Neo is likely to deliver superior image quality.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) has a slight edge in CPU clock speed (2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Y58’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2). The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 7030 also suggests potentially better power efficiency under sustained load compared to the Snapdragon’s 4nm node, despite the Snapdragon’s architectural improvements. Both CPUs feature an octa-core configuration with the same Cortex-A78 and A55 core arrangement, but the higher clock speeds on the Dimensity 7030 will translate to snappier performance in demanding applications. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 will excel in efficiency for everyday tasks.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department. Its 10:28h active use score demonstrates excellent real-world endurance. The 68W wired charging is a significant advantage, allowing for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. While the vivo Y58 offers 44W charging, it’s slower. The Y58’s battery capacity is not specified, but the Edge 40 Neo’s combination of endurance and charging speed makes it the clear winner for users who prioritize these features.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y58 if you need a dependable phone with a focus on efficiency and long-term software support, and are less concerned with the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize rapid charging, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a longer-lasting battery for heavy usage throughout the day.