The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y56 and Samsung Galaxy A14 5G are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at an accessible price point, but which one delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G edges out the vivo Y56 thanks to its more efficient chipset (Exynos 1330), brighter display, and generally better software support. While the Y56 has a slightly faster CPU, the A14 5G's overall package is more polished and future-proof.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 2, 5, 66, 77 Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 17 | 2023, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, February 17 | Available. Released 2023, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.6 x 8.2 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.32 in) | 167.7 x 78 x 9.1 mm (6.60 x 3.07 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | IPX4 water/ IP5X dust resistant | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~80.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146BOcta-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) - SM-A146P |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) - SM-A146BMediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) - SM-A146P |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP2 - SM-A146BMali-G57 MC2 - SM-A146P |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, One UI Core 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) - USA onlymicroSDXC (dedicated slot) - International |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (Exynos 1330 chipset only), recording |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Orange Shimmer, Black Engine | Black, Light Green, Dark Red, Silver |
| Models | V2225 | SM-A146B, SM-A146B/DS, SM-A146P, SM-A146P/DS, SM-A146U, SM-A146U1, SM-A146U1/DS, SM-A146W, SM-A146P/N, SM-A146P/DSN, SM-S146VL, SM-A146M |
| Price | About 220 EUR | $ 77.63 / C$ 151.00 / £ 97.00 / € 159.79 / ₹ 14,990 |
| SAR | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.56 W/kg (head) 1.28 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 130h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1334:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 307886 (v9)
GeekBench: 1727 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y56
- Slightly faster CPU clock speed
- Vivo's ecosystem integration
- Decent design
- Less efficient chipset
- Slower charging
- Lower display brightness
- Potentially shorter software support
Samsung Galaxy A14 5G
- Brighter display
- More efficient chipset (Exynos 1330)
- Longer battery life
- Better software support
- 5G Connectivity
- Slightly slower CPU clock speed
- 15W charging speed
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G boasts a noticeable advantage with its 519 nits max brightness, making it easier to view outdoors. Both phones offer a 1334:1 contrast ratio, indicating good black levels, but the A14 5G's higher brightness contributes to a more vibrant and enjoyable viewing experience. The Y56's display is adequate but lacks the punch of the A14 5G.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable, with both phones offering decent image quality in good lighting conditions. However, the A14 5G's software processing tends to produce more natural-looking images. Low-light performance is a weak point for both devices, but the A14 5G might have a slight edge due to its potentially better image processing algorithms. Specific camera specs (megapixels, aperture) are not provided, so a direct comparison is difficult.
Performance
While the vivo Y56's Dimensity 700 has a slightly faster CPU clock speed, the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G's Exynos 1330, built on a more efficient 5nm process, generally provides smoother and more responsive performance. The Exynos 1330 also handles multitasking and demanding apps more effectively. The 7nm Dimensity 700 can get warm under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G shines in this category with an impressive endurance rating of 130 hours. The vivo Y56's battery life is respectable, but falls short of the A14 5G's longevity. Both phones support 18W/15W wired charging, which is relatively slow by modern standards.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y56 is a good choice for users prioritizing a slightly faster CPU for basic tasks and those heavily invested in vivo's ecosystem. The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is ideal for those seeking a brighter display, longer software support, and a more modern chipset for smoother performance and 5G connectivity.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone has better 5G connectivity?
The Samsung Galaxy A14 5G is specifically designed for 5G networks, while the vivo Y56 may or may not support 5G depending on the specific variant. Check the model number to confirm 5G support.
❓ Which phone will receive longer software updates?
Samsung generally provides longer software update support for its Galaxy A series devices compared to vivo's Y series. Expect more Android version upgrades and security patches on the Galaxy A14 5G.
