vivo Y55s (2023) vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G: A Head-to-Head Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Redmi Note 11S 5G edges out the Y55s thanks to its faster charging, slightly more powerful chipset, and 5G connectivity. While the Y55s offers a decent experience, the Redmi Note 11S 5G provides a more future-proof and feature-rich package for a similar price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y55s (2023) | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, January 21 | 2022, March 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 21 | Available. Released 2022, April 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.9 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 163.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~83.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Midnight Black, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | - | 22031116BG |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 140 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1314:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 360255 (v9) GeekBench: 1820 (v5.1) GFXBench: 13fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y55s (2023)
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Clean and user-friendly software
- Good value for money
- Slower charging speed
- Less powerful chipset compared to Redmi Note 11S 5G
- No 5G connectivity
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G
- Faster charging (33W)
- More powerful Dimensity 810 chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Potentially better camera system
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be polarizing
- May have slightly more bloatware
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar contrast ratios (1314:1), but the Redmi Note 11S 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 509 nits, potentially offering better visibility in bright sunlight. The Y55s likely has a slightly different panel technology, but detailed specs are unavailable. Both likely offer a standard 6.43-inch display with a FHD+ resolution.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but both phones are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities. The Redmi Note 11S 5G likely has a more versatile camera system, potentially including a higher resolution main sensor and additional lenses. Expect decent image quality from both, but the Redmi Note 11S 5G likely has a slight edge in low-light performance and overall detail.
Performance
The Redmi Note 11S 5G's Dimensity 810 chipset (6nm) holds a performance advantage over the Y55s' Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Dimensity 810 generally offers better CPU and GPU performance, resulting in smoother app loading, multitasking, and gaming. While both have octa-core CPUs, the Dimensity 810's architecture is more efficient.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11S 5G boasts an impressive endurance rating of 131 hours, suggesting excellent battery life. The Y55s' battery capacity is likely similar, but the Redmi Note 11S 5G's more efficient chipset contributes to its superior longevity. Furthermore, the 33W fast charging on the Redmi Note 11S 5G is significantly faster than the Y55s' 18W charging.
Buying Guide
The vivo Y55s (2023) is a good choice for users prioritizing a reliable and straightforward smartphone experience with a focus on everyday tasks. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11S 5G is ideal for those seeking 5G connectivity, faster charging, and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.