The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) and the vivo Y55s (2021) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a connected experience, they diverge significantly in their approach to performance and charging speed, making a direct comparison crucial for discerning buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a more modern chipset, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is the clear winner. Its 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a slight edge in efficiency. However, the vivo Y55s remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 04 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 22 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 199.8 g (7.05 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | - | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | V2164A | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo Y55s (2021)
- More affordable price point
- Reliable Dimensity 700 processor for everyday tasks
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Slow 18W charging
- Less efficient chipset (7nm vs 6nm)
- Potentially lower camera performance
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset (6nm)
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Higher price tag
- May not offer a dramatically different experience for basic users
- Potential for software bloat (Xiaomi's MIUI)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on the underlying processing power impacting UI smoothness. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket. The difference isn't in display quality, but how well the chipset can drive it – a task the Snapdragon 695 is better equipped for.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 695 typically supports more advanced image signal processors (ISPs), enabling features like better low-light performance and faster image processing. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in more vibrant and detailed photos. The vivo Y55s will likely deliver acceptable image quality for social media, but may struggle in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the vivo Y55s features the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 generally translates to better power efficiency and potentially lower thermal throttling under sustained loads. While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz core configuration, the Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores are architecturally more advanced than the Dimensity 700’s Cortex-A76 cores, offering a slight performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 695 also benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software and modem integration.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer. Advertised figures claim a 50% charge in 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime compared to the vivo Y55s’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency also contributes to longer battery life between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y55s (2021) if you need a functional 5G smartphone with a reliable processor for everyday tasks and prioritize affordability above all else. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prefer significantly faster charging, a more efficient chipset fabricated on a smaller node, and are willing to spend a bit more for a smoother overall experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G powerful enough for demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 can handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. However, don't expect to max out the graphics. The 6nm process helps with sustained performance, but it's not a gaming powerhouse. The Dimensity 700 in the Y55s will struggle more with higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y55s in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can go from 0-50% in about 15 minutes, while the vivo Y55s will take well over an hour to reach the same level. This means significantly less time tethered to a charger with the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G support carrier aggregation for improved 5G speeds?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 supports carrier aggregation, which allows it to combine multiple 5G bands for faster and more reliable speeds, provided your carrier supports it. The Dimensity 700 also supports carrier aggregation, but the Snapdragon 695 generally has a more mature modem implementation.
