OnePlus Nord 2T vs vivo Y55s (2021): A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2T is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 1300 chipset offers significantly improved performance, and the 80W SuperVOOC charging is a game-changer, fully replenishing the battery far faster than the Y55s' 18W charging. While the Y55s is more affordable, the Nord 2T’s benefits justify the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y55s (2021) | OnePlus Nord 2T |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| CDMA2000 1x | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, December 04 | 2022, May 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 22 | Available. Released 2022, May 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.3 x 9.2 mm (6.45 x 2.96 x 0.36 in) | 159.1 x 73.2 x 8.2 mm (6.26 x 2.88 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199.8 g (7.05 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, OxygenOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF 2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | Auto HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, NavIC |
| Radio | - | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 80W wired, PD |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Pink | Gray Shadow, Jade Fog |
| Models | V2164A | CPH2399, CPH2401 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 144.39 / $ 169.99 / ₹ 31,490 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 100h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 490545 (v8) | 604467 (v9) GeekBench: 2790 (v5.1) GFXBench: 40fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y55s (2021)
- More affordable price point
- Decent battery life for basic use
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly slower charging
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks
- Display likely less bright and vibrant
OnePlus Nord 2T
- Much faster 80W charging
- Significantly more powerful Dimensity 1300 chipset
- Brighter and potentially more color-accurate display
- Likely superior camera performance
- Higher price tag
- May not offer a dramatically longer battery life despite faster charging
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2T boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 636 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the Y55s. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price points), the Nord 2T’s higher brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. The Nord 2T’s 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a standard IPS contrast level, while the Y55s’ display specifications are not provided. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Nord 2T’s brighter panel is a clear advantage for users who consume a lot of media in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are limited. The Nord 2T likely benefits from a more sophisticated image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 1300, enabling better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Without sensor size or aperture information for either device, it’s difficult to make definitive claims. However, the Nord 2T’s higher-tier chipset suggests a more capable camera system overall. The Y55s likely relies on software optimizations to compensate for potentially less advanced hardware.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s Mediatek Dimensity 1300 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y55s’ Dimensity 700 (7nm). The Dimensity 1300 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 core alongside 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, versus the Y55s’ 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This translates to significantly faster application loading times and smoother multitasking. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1300 also offers improved power efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the faster chipset will be the bottleneck for the Y55s.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 100 hours, suggesting similar battery life under typical usage. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The OnePlus Nord 2T’s 80W SuperVOOC charging with PD support is a major advantage, allowing for a full charge in approximately 30 minutes. The vivo Y55s’ 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly longer to reach 100%. This difference in charging speed is a key differentiator for users who prioritize convenience and minimal downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y55s (2021) if you prioritize affordability above all else and need a reliable device for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2T if you value faster performance for gaming and multitasking, significantly quicker charging speeds, and a more refined overall user experience, even if it means spending a bit more.