The vivo Y55 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both devices aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge in key areas like chipset performance and charging speed, making the choice dependent on individual priorities. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and a slight performance edge, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a modest but noticeable improvement over the Snapdragon 680 in the vivo Y55.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 02 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 02 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 27 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Galaxy, Ice Dawn | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | - | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo Y55
- Efficient Snapdragon 680 processor for everyday tasks
- Reliable Qualcomm chipset
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Slower 44W charging compared to the competition
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G chipset with 5G connectivity
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support
- Potentially better camera performance due to ISP
- May be slightly more expensive
- Snapdragon 695 may not offer a massive performance leap over the 680
Display Comparison
While display specifications are absent in the provided data, both phones likely feature LCD panels given their price points. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G, historically, has featured AMOLED displays in other regions, suggesting a potential advantage in color vibrancy and contrast if the Indian variant follows suit. Bezels are expected to be similar, with both aiming for a modern, immersive viewing experience. Without specific data, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or peak brightness.
Camera Comparison
Without camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, Xiaomi’s Redmi Note series often prioritizes camera capabilities, potentially offering a more versatile camera system. The Snapdragon 695’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is likely more advanced than the 680’s, enabling better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. The absence of details like sensor size and aperture makes a definitive judgment impossible, but Xiaomi’s track record suggests a stronger emphasis on camera features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Y55 utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, built on a 6nm process, while the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) features the Snapdragon 695 5G, also on a 6nm process. The 695 boasts a slightly faster prime core clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 2.4 GHz) but a different core configuration (2x Kryo 660 Gold vs 4x Kryo 265 Gold). The 695’s inclusion of 5G connectivity is a significant advantage for users in areas with 5G coverage. While the Y55’s 4x Kryo 265 Gold cores may offer a burst of speed, the 695’s architecture is generally more efficient for sustained workloads. This translates to a smoother experience with multitasking and moderately demanding games on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G.
Battery Life
Both phones utilize a 6nm chipset, contributing to good power efficiency. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer. It can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and fully charge in 42 minutes (advertised), significantly reducing downtime compared to the vivo Y55’s 44W charging, which takes 27 minutes to reach 50%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y55 if you prioritize a reliable, efficient processor for everyday tasks and value a slightly more conservative approach to charging. It’s ideal for users who don’t heavily game or require the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you need faster 5G connectivity, a quicker charging experience, and a bit more processing power for demanding applications and occasional gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G offer a noticeable gaming improvement over the Snapdragon 680 in the vivo Y55?
While neither chipset is designed for hardcore gaming, the Snapdragon 695 provides a modest performance boost. Expect slightly higher frame rates and smoother gameplay in demanding titles, but don't anticipate flagship-level performance. The 695’s improved thermal management may also lead to less throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 44W charging on the vivo Y55 in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is significantly faster. While the vivo Y55 takes 27 minutes to reach 50%, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G achieves the same in just 15 minutes. A full charge takes approximately 42 minutes on the Redmi, compared to a longer duration on the vivo Y55. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G useful if I don't currently have 5G coverage in my area?
Even without immediate 5G access, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G offers future-proofing. As 5G networks expand, you'll be ready to take advantage of faster speeds. Furthermore, the 5G modem often provides improved 4G connectivity and signal strength compared to 4G-only modems.
