The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y55 and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G both aim to deliver a compelling experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches. The Y55 focuses on a streamlined experience with a Snapdragon 680, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts 5G connectivity and faster charging with the Snapdragon 695. This comparison dives deep to determine which phone offers the best balance of features and performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Y55’s Snapdragon 680, and the significantly faster 67W charging is a game-changer. While both phones offer similar battery endurance, the Poco’s added 5G capability provides future-proofing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 02 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 02 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 27 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Galaxy, Ice Dawn | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y55
- Simple and reliable software experience
- Adequate performance for basic tasks
- Competitive price point
- Limited to 4G connectivity
- Slower charging speed compared to the Poco
- Less powerful processor
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster Snapdragon 695 5G processor
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Potentially more bloatware (typical of Xiaomi)
- Larger size may not suit all users
- Software updates may be less frequent than vivo
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given the price point, expect both to offer adequate, but not exceptional, viewing experiences. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s larger display size (typically 6.67 inches vs. the Y55’s 6.58 inches) provides a more immersive experience for media consumption, though this comes at the cost of slightly reduced pixel density.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the market segment suggests both will rely on primary sensors in the 50MP range. The Poco X4 Pro 5G often includes additional sensors (ultrawide, macro) that, while not always high quality, offer versatility. The image processing algorithms will likely differ, with Xiaomi typically favoring more saturated colors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon 695 5G, built on a 6nm process, represents a clear upgrade over the Y55’s Snapdragon 680. The 695 features a more modern CPU configuration (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) compared to the Y55’s (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver). This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and improved gaming performance on the Poco. The 5G modem in the 695 also provides future-proofing, while the Y55 is limited to 4G.
Battery Life
Both phones boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating comparable battery life under typical usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, is significantly faster than the Y55’s 44W charging. The Poco can reach 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, while the Y55 takes 27 minutes to reach 50%. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y55 if you prioritize a simple, reliable experience and don't require 5G connectivity. It's a solid option for basic users who primarily browse, message, and make calls. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want a more capable device for gaming, streaming, and future-proofing with 5G. The faster charging and slightly more powerful processor make it a better all-around performer.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low for a consistently smooth experience. It's not a dedicated gaming chip, but it offers a noticeable improvement over the Snapdragon 680 in the Y55 for gaming.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 44W charging on the vivo Y55 in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G is significantly faster. It can reach 70% charge in just 22 minutes, while the Y55 takes nearly 30 minutes to reach 50%. This means you can get a substantial charge in a much shorter amount of time with the Poco, making it ideal for users who are always on the go.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco X4 Pro 5G worth the extra cost if I don't have 5G coverage in my area yet?
Even if 5G isn't currently available, the 5G modem future-proofs the device. As 5G networks expand, you'll be ready to take advantage of faster speeds without needing to upgrade your phone. It also generally offers improved 4G performance in areas with congested networks.
