The vivo Y55 and Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a smooth user experience, they take different approaches to achieving this. The Y55 leverages Qualcomm’s efficiency-focused Snapdragon 680, while the F19 Pro+ 5G opts for MediaTek’s more powerful Dimensity 800U. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and efficient power management, the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Dimensity 800U chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Snapdragon 680 in the vivo Y55, making it better suited for demanding tasks and gaming, despite slightly slower charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 02 | 2021, March 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 02 | Available. Released 2021, March 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6853 Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 27 min | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4310 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Galaxy, Ice Dawn | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue |
| Models | - | CPH2213 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | ₹ 25,990 |
vivo Y55
- Faster 44W charging
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Less powerful CPU and GPU
- Likely less sophisticated camera system
- May struggle with demanding games
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- More powerful Dimensity 800U chipset
- Superior gaming performance
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slower 50W charging (advertised)
- Higher power consumption
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are absent, the focus here is on processing power, not visual fidelity. Both likely utilize IPS LCD panels common in this price bracket. The real difference lies in the chipsets powering the UI, impacting smoothness of animations and app loading times, rather than the display itself.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of sensors, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G, being a 'Pro+' model, likely features a more sophisticated camera system. The Dimensity 800U’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is generally more advanced than the Snapdragon 680’s, potentially leading to better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) – a common feature in 'Pro' models – would further enhance image quality on the Oppo, a feature likely absent on the more budget-focused Y55.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s MediaTek Dimensity 800U (7nm) is architecturally superior to the vivo Y55’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The Dimensity 800U features a Cortex-A76 based CPU, offering significantly higher single-core performance compared to the Snapdragon 680’s Kryo 265 Gold cores. This translates to snappier app launches and a more fluid multitasking experience. While the Snapdragon 680 benefits from a slightly smaller node size, the architectural advantage of the Dimensity 800U outweighs this in real-world performance. The Dimensity 800U also includes a more capable Mali-G57 MC4 GPU, providing a better gaming experience than the Snapdragon 680’s Adreno 610.
Battery Life
The vivo Y55’s 44W charging is faster than the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s advertised 50W charging (reaching 100% in 48 minutes). However, charging speed isn’t everything. The Dimensity 800U is more power-hungry than the Snapdragon 680. While the Y55 might charge faster, the F19 Pro+ 5G’s more efficient chipset management could result in comparable, or even slightly better, real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar or smaller battery capacity. The Snapdragon 680’s efficiency will be appreciated by users who prioritize all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y55 if you need a reliable daily driver with excellent battery life and prioritize a lower price point. It’s ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G if you prefer a more responsive experience, enjoy mobile gaming, and value the extra processing power for multitasking and future-proofing, even if it means slightly less battery endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 800U in the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 800U is more powerful, MediaTek has made strides in thermal management. However, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. The F19 Pro+ 5G’s thermal design (which isn’t specified) will be crucial. Expect some throttling after extended play, but it should be manageable, offering a better gaming experience overall than the Snapdragon 680.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 in the vivo Y55 sufficient for playing popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. It’s not ideal for demanding gamers, and you may experience occasional stuttering or lag, especially in intense firefights. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G offers a significantly better gaming experience.
❓ How does the 5G performance differ between the two phones?
Both phones support 5G, but the Dimensity 800U generally offers more robust 5G modem capabilities than the Snapdragon 680. This translates to potentially faster and more stable 5G connections, especially in areas with challenging network conditions. However, real-world 5G performance is also heavily dependent on carrier infrastructure and network congestion.
