The vivo Y55 and Motorola Moto G52 occupy a similar price bracket, both powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. This comparison isn't about raw power – they're identical in that regard – but about how each manufacturer optimizes around that core, particularly in areas like charging speed and overall user experience. We'll dissect the nuances to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y55 emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones share the same Snapdragon 680 chipset, the Y55’s significantly faster 44W charging – capable of delivering 50% charge in just 27 minutes – provides a tangible convenience advantage over the Moto G52’s 30W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, July 02 | 2022, April 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 02 | Available. Released 2022, April 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 160.8 x 73.8 x 8.4 mm (6.33 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 160.1 x 74.5 x 8 mm (6.30 x 2.93 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 169 g (5.96 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Schott Xensation glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.44 inches, 100.1 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~86.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8 (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 27 min | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Midnight Galaxy, Ice Dawn | Charcoal Gray, Porcelain White |
| Models | - | XT2221-1, XT2221-2 |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 470 EUR |
vivo Y55
- Significantly faster 44W charging
- Potentially more vibrant image processing (typical of vivo)
- Faster charging reduces downtime
- Software experience may be less clean than Motorola
- Display specifications unknown
Motorola Moto G52
- Potentially cleaner software experience (typical of Motorola)
- May be available at a slightly lower price
- Reliable Snapdragon 680 performance
- Slower 30W charging
- Display specifications unknown
- May lack the charging convenience of the Y55
Display Comparison
Both the vivo Y55 and Motorola Moto G52 lack detailed display specifications in the provided data. However, given their price point, we can anticipate both utilizing LCD panels. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests a standard 60Hz experience on both. The real-world difference will likely come down to color calibration and peak brightness, areas where Motorola historically performs well, but without concrete data, it's difficult to definitively state which offers a superior viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Without sensor details, a detailed camera comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but the quality will depend heavily on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit. Image processing style will be a key differentiator – vivo often leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Motorola typically aims for a more natural look. Without sample images, it’s impossible to determine which approach is superior.
Performance
The core of both devices is the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold and 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver cores. This means identical CPU performance for everyday tasks and gaming. The 6nm process node contributes to reasonable power efficiency, but neither phone is positioned as a gaming powerhouse. RAM configurations, not provided, will influence multitasking capabilities; however, the chipset itself is the primary performance bottleneck. Thermal management will likely be similar, as both rely on passive cooling solutions.
Battery Life
The battery capacity isn't specified, but the crucial difference lies in charging speed. The vivo Y55 boasts 44W wired charging, achieving a 50% charge in just 27 minutes. This is a significant advantage over the Motorola Moto G52’s 30W charging. While a larger battery capacity on the Moto G52 could partially offset this, the faster charging of the Y55 translates to less time tethered to a wall outlet. For users who frequently need to top up their battery throughout the day, the Y55 is the clear winner.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y55 if you prioritize minimizing downtime and value the convenience of rapid charging. Its 44W charging is a clear benefit for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost. Buy the Motorola Moto G52 if you prefer Motorola’s cleaner software experience and potentially a slightly lower price point, accepting the trade-off of slower charging speeds. It’s a solid option for users who aren’t as concerned about topping up their battery quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 680 in either phone struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680 is a capable processor for casual gaming, but it will likely struggle with demanding titles like PUBG Mobile at high settings. Expect to need to lower graphics settings and potentially frame rates for a smooth experience on both the vivo Y55 and Motorola Moto G52. Neither phone is designed for hardcore mobile gaming.
❓ How does the 44W charging on the vivo Y55 compare to other phones with similar wattage?
While 44W isn't the fastest charging available, it's a significant step up from the 30W on the Moto G52. In real-world use, 44W charging typically translates to a full charge in around 60-75 minutes, depending on battery capacity. The advertised 50% charge in 27 minutes is a realistic expectation, providing a substantial boost in a short amount of time.
❓ Are there any known overheating issues with the Snapdragon 680 in these devices?
The Snapdragon 680 is generally known for its power efficiency, and overheating isn't a widespread issue. However, prolonged gaming or intensive multitasking can cause some heat buildup. Both the vivo Y55 and Motorola Moto G52 utilize passive cooling, so sustained performance may be throttled slightly under heavy load.
