Both the vivo Y54s and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China variant) target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, leveraging Mediatek’s Dimensity series of chipsets. However, a significant gap exists in their processing power and charging capabilities, making the choice dependent on user priorities. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 1100 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Y54s’ Dimensity 700, and the blazing-fast 67W charging dramatically improves usability. While the Y54s offers a more affordable entry point, the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s advantages justify the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2021, May 26 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2021, June 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.4 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188.4 g (6.63 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, Panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | V2045A | - |
| Price | About 240 EUR | About 200 EUR |
vivo Y54s
- More affordable price point
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset for basic tasks
- Sufficient for everyday smartphone use
- Significantly slower charging (18W)
- Less powerful processor for demanding applications
- Likely lower quality display
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China)
- Much faster 67W charging with PD3.0
- Superior performance with Dimensity 1100
- Likely better camera system with larger sensor and OIS
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y54s
- Potentially larger size and weight
- May not be readily available in all markets
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Redmi Note 10 Pro’s positioning, it likely features a higher resolution and potentially a higher refresh rate panel than the Y54s. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s market segment typically includes displays with better color accuracy and peak brightness, enhancing media consumption. The Y54s, aiming for a lower price point, likely utilizes a more cost-effective display solution.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, the Redmi Note 10 Pro, positioned as a ‘Pro’ model, likely features a larger main sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS) compared to the Y54s. The Dimensity 1100’s image signal processor (ISP) also offers more advanced image processing capabilities, resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Y54s likely relies on software processing to compensate for a potentially less capable sensor. The presence of a 67W charging solution suggests a higher overall component quality in the Redmi Note 10 Pro, potentially extending to the camera module.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro’s Dimensity 1100 (6nm) boasts a more advanced architecture with 4x Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.6 GHz, compared to the vivo Y54s’ Dimensity 700 (7nm) featuring 2x Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. This translates to a significant performance advantage for the Redmi Note 10 Pro in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1100 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both utilize Cortex-A55 efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz, the superior core count and architecture of the Dimensity 1100 provide a clear edge.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s 67W wired charging is a game-changer, capable of charging the device from 0-100% in a claimed 42 minutes. The vivo Y54s’ 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly longer to fully replenish the battery. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Redmi Note 10 Pro mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery, offering more convenient top-ups throughout the day. The inclusion of PD3.0 support in the Redmi Note 10 Pro further enhances charging versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y54s if you prioritize affordability and basic smartphone functionality, needing a reliable device for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro (China) if you demand smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and significantly faster charging – essential for power users and those who frequently rely on their phone throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1100’s 6nm process node and improved thermal design in the Redmi Note 10 Pro mitigate overheating concerns. While some throttling may occur during prolonged, intensive gaming, it’s less likely to be severe compared to older or less efficient chipsets. The phone’s cooling system, though not specified, is likely optimized for the Dimensity 1100’s power output.
❓ Does the 67W charging of the Redmi Note 10 Pro degrade the battery health faster than the 18W charging of the Y54s?
While faster charging can theoretically contribute to slightly faster battery degradation over the long term, modern smartphones employ sophisticated charging algorithms to minimize this effect. The Redmi Note 10 Pro’s charging circuitry is designed to protect battery health, and the convenience of rapid charging outweighs the minimal potential for accelerated degradation. The Y54s' slower charging doesn't necessarily guarantee longer battery lifespan, as battery aging is influenced by numerous factors beyond charging speed.
❓ Will the Redmi Note 10 Pro run graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact smoothly?
The Dimensity 1100 in the Redmi Note 10 Pro is capable of running Genshin Impact, but expect to make compromises on graphics settings. You’ll likely need to play at medium or low settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Y54s’ Dimensity 700 would struggle significantly with Genshin Impact, requiring substantial graphics reductions and potentially still experiencing lag.
