Both the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro and the vivo Y54s target the budget-conscious smartphone user, but they approach the market with different philosophies. The Poco X3 Pro prioritizes raw processing power, leveraging the Snapdragon 860, while the Y54s focuses on efficiency with the Dimensity 700. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding performance, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 860 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage. However, the vivo Y54s offers a more balanced experience with a potentially more efficient processor, making it suitable for everyday tasks and lighter use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2021, March 22 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2021, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.4 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 165.3 x 76.8 x 9.4 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188.4 g (6.63 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 2404Hz PWM, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.96 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 Gold & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, Panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 1080p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Phantom Black, Frost Blue, Metal Bronze |
| Models | V2045A | M2102J20SG, M2102J20SI |
| Price | About 240 EUR | $ 128.04 / £ 249.99 |
| SAR | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.67 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.57 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 112h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1401:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.1 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 453223 (v8)
GeekBench: 2574 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y54s
- More powerful Snapdragon 860 chipset for superior gaming.
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups.
- Likely better camera performance due to higher-end hardware.
- Potentially higher power consumption due to the more powerful chipset.
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro
- More efficient Dimensity 700 chipset for potentially longer battery life during light use.
- Lower price point (likely).
- Sufficient for everyday tasks and casual gaming.
- Significantly less powerful than the Snapdragon 860.
- Slower 18W charging.
Display Comparison
Both devices share a nominal contrast ratio of 1401:1, suggesting similar visual pop. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and panel type are missing for the Y54s. Given the Poco X3 Pro’s positioning, it likely features a higher peak brightness for better outdoor visibility. The lack of information on the Y54s’ display suggests a more basic panel, potentially impacting color accuracy and viewing angles.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are absent. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Poco X3 Pro likely has a more capable main sensor. The Y54s likely relies on software processing to enhance image quality, while the Poco X3 Pro may offer more natural and detailed photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of details on both cameras makes it hard to assess their true capabilities, but the Poco X3 Pro’s overall hardware advantage suggests a better photographic experience.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X3 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 (7nm) boasts a prime core clocked at 2.96 GHz, alongside three additional performance cores at 2.42 GHz, and four efficiency cores at 1.78 GHz. This configuration significantly outperforms the vivo Y54s’ MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7nm) with its 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The Snapdragon 860’s higher clock speeds and more robust core configuration translate to noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. While both are 7nm chips, the architectural differences favor Qualcomm in this matchup. The Poco X3 Pro will handle graphically intensive games at higher settings with greater stability.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Poco X3 Pro’s 33W wired charging (59% in 30 min, 100% in 59 min) is significantly faster than the Y54s’ 18W charging. This means the Poco X3 Pro can be quickly topped up, minimizing downtime. While the Y54s may offer comparable longevity, the Poco X3 Pro’s faster charging is a crucial advantage for users who need to recharge quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y54s if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks, social media, and occasional light gaming, and value a potentially more efficient chipset. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro if you prioritize gaming performance, demanding apps, and want the most processing power for your dollar, even if it means slightly faster battery drain.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X3 Pro's Snapdragon 860 overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 860 is known for its strong performance, but it can generate heat under sustained load. The Poco X3 Pro incorporates thermal management solutions, but some throttling may occur during extended gaming. However, the throttling is generally well-managed and doesn't significantly impact gameplay.
❓ Is the Dimensity 700 in the vivo Y54s sufficient for playing popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Dimensity 700 can handle PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. It's suitable for casual gaming, but won't provide the same level of performance as the Snapdragon 860 in the Poco X3 Pro.
❓ How does the charging speed difference impact daily use? Will the Y54s' slower charging be a major inconvenience?
The 18W charging on the Y54s is noticeably slower than the 33W charging on the Poco X3 Pro. While it won't be a dealbreaker for everyone, users who frequently need to top up their phone quickly will find the Poco X3 Pro's charging speed much more convenient. A full charge will take almost double the time on the Y54s.
