The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G and vivo Y54s represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a modern smartphone experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage, coupled with a brighter display and a more refined camera experience. While the vivo Y54s offers a lower entry price, the A52s 5G’s overall package justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 18 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Cancelled | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 75.4 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188.4 g (6.63 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, Panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Black | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | V2045A | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 240 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y54s
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 778G
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster 25W charging
- Likely better camera quality with OIS
- Generally higher price point
- May be slightly heavier than the Y54s
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More affordable price
- Decent battery life (113h endurance)
- 5G connectivity
- Lightweight design (likely)
- Slower performance with Dimensity 700
- Less vibrant display
- Slower 18W charging
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y54s. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the higher brightness of the A52s 5G provides a more dynamic and engaging viewing experience. The A52s 5G’s panel technology is likely Super AMOLED, known for its vibrant colors and deep blacks, while the Y54s likely uses an IPS LCD, which typically offers less contrast and color accuracy.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is expected to deliver superior image quality. While specific sensor details are missing for both, Samsung’s image processing algorithms and potentially larger sensor size (based on market positioning) give it an edge. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), a feature often found in Samsung’s A-series phones, resulting in sharper images and smoother videos, especially in low-light conditions. The Y54s, while capable, likely relies more on software processing to compensate for potential hardware limitations.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G utilizes the Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm), while the vivo Y54s is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 700 (7 nm). The Snapdragon 778G, built on a more efficient 6nm process, features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Y54s’ 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup. This architectural advantage, combined with the process node, results in superior CPU and GPU performance on the A52s 5G, making it better suited for demanding games and applications. The Snapdragon 778G also benefits from Qualcomm’s Adreno 642L GPU, offering a more capable graphics experience.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life despite the vivo Y54s’ unspecified battery capacity. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging significantly outperforms the Y54s’ 18W charging. This means the A52s 5G can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. A full charge from 0-100% on the A52s 5G will take considerably less time than on the Y54s, offering a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y54s if you prioritize affordability above all else and your primary use case revolves around basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value smoother performance for gaming and multitasking, a brighter and more vibrant display for media consumption, and a more versatile camera system capable of capturing higher-quality photos and videos.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 778G in the Galaxy A52s 5G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 778G is known for its efficiency. While it will generate heat during prolonged gaming, the 6nm process and Samsung’s thermal management system generally prevent significant throttling, allowing for sustained performance. Expect warm temperatures, but not overheating that severely impacts gameplay.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the vivo Y54s slow compared to other phones in this price range?
Yes, 18W charging is relatively slow compared to the 25W or even 33W charging found on some competing devices. Expect a longer charging time – potentially over 2 hours for a full charge from 0% – which may be inconvenient for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ How does the Dimensity 700 handle graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile on the vivo Y54s?
The Dimensity 700 can run PUBG Mobile, but you’ll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. Expect occasional frame drops during intense action sequences. It’s suitable for casual gaming, but not ideal for demanding gamers.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G support software updates for a long period?
Samsung has significantly improved its software update commitment. The Galaxy A52s 5G is expected to receive at least three years of Android OS updates and four years of security patches, ensuring long-term software support and security.
