The vivo Y53s and Tecno Camon 17 Pro represent compelling options in the sub-$200 smartphone market. The Y53s prioritizes 5G connectivity with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 480, while the Camon 17 Pro focuses on camera capabilities and faster charging, leveraging MediaTek’s Helio G95. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and occasional gaming, the vivo Y53s offers a slight edge thanks to its 5G connectivity and more efficient 8nm process. However, users heavily invested in photography and requiring faster charging will find the Tecno Camon 17 Pro a more suitable choice.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 09 | 2021, May 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 11 | Available. Released 2021, June 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 168.9 x 77 x 9 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W / 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | California Silver, Malibu Blue |
| Models | V2111A, V2058 | CG8, CG8h |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 280 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 140h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 781:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.4 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 309107 (v8)
GeekBench: 1668 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y53s
- 5G Connectivity for future-proof network access
- More efficient 8nm Snapdragon 480 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely less capable camera system
Tecno Camon 17 Pro
- Faster 25W/33W charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially superior camera performance
- Higher peak display brightness
- Less power-efficient 12nm Helio G95 chipset
- Lacks integrated 5G modem
Display Comparison
Both devices share a similar contrast ratio of 781:1, suggesting comparable color reproduction. However, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 538 nits, which will translate to better visibility outdoors compared to the Y53s, whose brightness is not specified. While both are likely LCD panels given the price point, the Camon 17 Pro’s higher brightness provides a tangible advantage in real-world viewing conditions.
Camera Comparison
The Tecno Camon 17 Pro is positioned as a camera-centric device, though specifics beyond 'Photo / Video' capabilities are lacking. The absence of detailed sensor information makes a direct comparison difficult. However, given Tecno’s marketing focus, it’s reasonable to assume a more sophisticated camera system than the Y53s. The Y53s likely features a standard camera setup geared towards everyday photography. Without further details, the Camon 17 Pro likely holds an advantage for users prioritizing image quality and versatility, assuming it features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing.
Performance
The Tecno Camon 17 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) and the vivo Y53s’ Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) represent different approaches to performance. The Helio G95, with its Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, offers a slight CPU advantage in raw processing power. However, the Snapdragon 480’s 8nm fabrication process is more efficient, potentially leading to better thermal management and sustained performance during prolonged tasks. The Snapdragon 480 also integrates a 5G modem, a key differentiator for future network compatibility. The Y53s will benefit users who want to take advantage of 5G networks, while the Camon 17 Pro may offer a smoother experience in CPU-intensive tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 140 hours, indicating similar overall battery life under typical usage. However, the Tecno Camon 17 Pro’s 25W/33W charging capability significantly outperforms the vivo Y53s’ 18W charging. This translates to substantially faster charging times, reducing downtime. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging on the Camon 17 Pro is a clear benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y53s if you need reliable 5G access for streaming and downloading on the go, and value a more power-efficient chipset for extended battery life during moderate use. Buy the Tecno Camon 17 Pro if you prioritize a versatile camera system for capturing detailed photos and videos, and need the convenience of 25W/33W fast charging to quickly replenish the battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G95 in the Tecno Camon 17 Pro get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Helio G95 is known to generate more heat than newer, more efficient chipsets. While the Camon 17 Pro likely has thermal management features, prolonged gaming at high settings could lead to noticeable warming and potential performance throttling. The Snapdragon 480 in the Y53s, with its 8nm process, is expected to handle heat more effectively.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Tecno Camon 17 Pro compared to the vivo Y53s in a real-world scenario?
The Tecno Camon 17 Pro’s 25W/33W charging will significantly reduce charging times. Expect a full charge from 0-100% in approximately 60-90 minutes, compared to potentially over 2 hours with the Y53s’ 18W charging. This difference is particularly noticeable for quick top-ups when you need power urgently.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the vivo Y53s actually useful if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
Even with limited 5G coverage, the Y53s will fall back to 4G LTE. However, having the 5G modem future-proofs the device for when 5G infrastructure expands. It also offers potentially faster download speeds in areas with even partial 5G coverage.
