The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y53s and Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, but they take drastically different approaches to achieving this. The Y53s focuses on affordability, while the A52s 5G prioritizes performance and a more refined user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a significantly faster and smoother experience, especially for gaming and demanding applications. While the Y53s offers a lower entry price, the A52s 5G’s performance advantage justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 09 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 11 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | V2111A, V2058 | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 230 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y53s
- More affordable price point
- 5G connectivity
- Decent battery endurance
- Significantly weaker processor
- Less vibrant display
- Potentially limited camera performance
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Powerful Snapdragon 778G processor
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster 25W charging
- Higher price tag
- May not offer significantly longer battery life despite faster charging
- Similar endurance rating to Y53s
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 800 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y53s. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both displays have an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, the A52s 5G’s superior brightness and likely better color calibration contribute to a more immersive viewing experience. The Y53s’ display specifications are less detailed, suggesting a more budget-oriented panel.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but the specifics are limited. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a precise comparison. However, the A52s 5G’s higher overall processing power likely translates to better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. The Y53s, relying on the less powerful Snapdragon 480, may struggle with complex image processing tasks. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the A52s 5G, if equipped, would further enhance its camera capabilities, particularly for video recording.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm), featuring a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core and 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 performance cores, alongside 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores. This is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y53s’ Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) with its 2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460 configuration. The 6nm process node of the 778G is more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The A78 cores in the 778G also offer a significant architectural advantage over the Kryo 460 cores in the 480, resulting in faster app loading times and smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
Both phones share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging is significantly faster than the vivo Y53s’ 18W charging. This means the A52s 5G can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While the mAh capacity isn't specified for either device, the more efficient Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G likely contributes to similar real-world battery performance despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y53s if you need a basic, functional 5G smartphone for essential tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and your budget is extremely limited. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you prioritize smooth performance, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more capable camera system for gaming, content creation, and a generally more responsive user experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 480 in the vivo Y53s struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
Yes, the Snapdragon 480 is an entry-level 5G chipset. While it can run PUBG and Call of Duty, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings significantly to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect noticeable lag and stuttering, especially in demanding scenarios. The A52s 5G with its Snapdragon 778G will provide a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ Is the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G a significant improvement over the 18W charging on the vivo Y53s?
Absolutely. 25W charging will noticeably reduce the time it takes to fully charge the Galaxy A52s 5G. While both phones have similar endurance ratings, the faster charging means less downtime and more time using your phone. Expect a 0-100% charge to be considerably quicker on the A52s 5G.
❓ How does the image processing differ between the two phones, given the chipset disparity?
The Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G has a much more powerful Image Signal Processor (ISP) than the Snapdragon 480 in the Y53s. This translates to better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The A52s 5G will likely produce sharper, more detailed, and more vibrant photos.
