The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G and vivo Y53s represent compelling options in the increasingly crowded budget 5G smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware choices, particularly in their chipsets and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and fast charging, the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 800U chipset offers a substantial performance uplift over the Snapdragon 480 in the vivo Y53s, coupled with significantly faster 50W charging. However, the vivo Y53s remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget who prioritize 5G connectivity over raw power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 09 | 2021, March 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 11 | Available. Released 2021, March 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 160.1 x 73.4 x 7.8 mm (6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek MT6853 Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, ColorOS 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps; gyro-EIS, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 50W wired, 100% in 48 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4310 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Fluid Black, Space Silver, Cosmo Blue |
| Models | V2111A, V2058 | CPH2213 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | ₹ 25,990 |
vivo Y53s
- Faster 5G performance with Snapdragon 480
- More affordable price point
- Acceptable battery life for basic usage
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks
- Potentially lower image processing quality
Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G
- Significantly faster charging (50W, 48min to 100%)
- More powerful Dimensity 800U chipset
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Higher price compared to the vivo Y53s
- May experience slightly more heat under heavy load
- Potentially slightly lower battery capacity (unconfirmed)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific display specs (resolution, panel type) are missing, the focus here is on the underlying performance. The difference lies elsewhere. The chipset's GPU will impact the smoothness of scrolling and animations, a factor where the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G has an advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of cameras, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset's ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a crucial role in image processing. The Dimensity 800U in the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G generally offers more advanced ISP capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Snapdragon 480's ISP is adequate for basic photography, but likely won't match the F19 Pro+'s processing prowess.
Performance
The core difference between these phones is the chipset. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G utilizes the Mediatek MT6853 Dimensity 800U, fabricated on a more efficient 7nm process. This translates to higher clock speeds (2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 vs 2.0 GHz Kryo 460) and a more powerful GPU, resulting in noticeably faster application loading times and smoother gaming. The vivo Y53s’ Snapdragon 480, while 5G capable, is built on an 8nm process and targets a lower performance tier. This means the F19 Pro+ 5G will handle demanding tasks and graphically intensive games with greater ease, and likely experience less thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G’s 50W wired charging is a game-changer, advertised to reach 100% in just 48 minutes. This significantly reduces downtime compared to the vivo Y53s’ slower 18W charging. While battery capacity isn't specified, the faster charging speed of the Oppo effectively mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. Users who frequently find themselves needing to top up their phone will greatly benefit from the F19 Pro+'s charging speed.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y53s if you need a functional 5G smartphone with acceptable performance for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light messaging, and you're on a very strict budget. Buy the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and you value the convenience of incredibly fast charging – even if it comes at a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 480 in the vivo Y53s struggle with graphically intensive games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 480 is a budget-oriented chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G with its Dimensity 800U will provide a significantly better gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent performance.
❓ How much faster is the 50W charging on the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y53s in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. Oppo advertises a full charge in 48 minutes. The vivo Y53s, with its 18W charging, will likely take over 2 hours to reach 100%. This means you can quickly top up the F19 Pro+ during short breaks, while the Y53s requires a much longer charging period.
❓ Does the Dimensity 800U in the Oppo F19 Pro+ 5G tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 800U is generally well-managed in terms of thermals. While it may get warm during extended gaming, it's unlikely to experience significant throttling like some higher-end chipsets. The 7nm process contributes to better efficiency compared to the 8nm Snapdragon 480.
