The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y53s and Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC represent compelling options for users seeking 5G connectivity and a feature-rich experience without breaking the bank. This comparison dissects their core components – from chipsets and charging to potential real-world performance – to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing faster charging and potentially smoother multitasking, the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC emerges as the winner. Its 33W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Helio G95, while older, offers a performance edge in sustained workloads. However, the Y53s’ 5G connectivity remains a strong draw for those in supported areas.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, June 09 | 2021, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 11 | Available. Released 2021, June 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, OriginOS 1.0 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | No | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret |
| Models | V2111A, V2058 | X695C |
| Price | About 230 EUR | - |
vivo Y53s
- 5G Connectivity: Enables faster data speeds where available.
- Qualcomm Chipset: Generally offers good power efficiency.
- Potentially Cleaner Software: vivo’s Funtouch OS is often less intrusive than other custom skins.
- Slow Charging: 18W charging is significantly slower than the competition.
- Less Powerful Processor: Snapdragon 480 is less capable than the Helio G95.
Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC
- Faster Charging: 33W charging significantly reduces downtime.
- More Powerful Processor: Helio G95 offers better performance for gaming and multitasking.
- NFC Support: Convenient for contactless payments and data transfer.
- Larger Process Node: 12nm process *could* lead to higher temperatures.
- Potentially Bloated Software: Infinix’s XOS can be feature-rich but also includes pre-installed apps.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, the focus here is on the underlying processors. Display quality is likely similar, leaning towards adequate for the price point. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this segment. The absence of high refresh rates on both devices suggests a focus on power efficiency rather than visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the presence of sensors, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Helio G95’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) generally offers more advanced features and processing capabilities than the Snapdragon 480’s. This *could* translate to better image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices suggests limited utility; the primary sensor quality will be the defining factor. We anticipate the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC to have a slight edge in image processing due to the more capable chipset.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y53s utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, fabricated on an 8nm process. This offers a balance of power efficiency and 5G capabilities. Its octa-core configuration (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) is geared towards everyday tasks. Conversely, the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC features the MediaTek Helio G95, built on a larger 12nm process. The G95’s CPU (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) offers a slight clock speed advantage and utilizes more powerful Cortex-A76 cores, translating to better performance in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The larger process node of the Helio G95 *could* lead to higher temperatures under sustained load, but the Note 10 Pro’s larger chassis may mitigate this. The Snapdragon 480’s 5G modem is a key advantage for users in areas with 5G coverage.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified, but the charging wattage is a significant differentiator. The vivo Y53s’ 18W charging is relatively slow in today’s market, requiring a substantial amount of time to fully charge. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s 33W charging is considerably faster, potentially reducing charge times by 40-50%. This is a crucial advantage for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day. Even if the Y53s has a slightly larger battery capacity, the Note 10 Pro’s faster charging will likely result in less downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y53s if you absolutely need 5G connectivity and prioritize a cleaner software experience, potentially benefiting from Qualcomm’s optimizations. Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC if you value faster charging speeds, a more powerful processor for gaming and multitasking, and don't mind a potentially more customized Android skin. The Note 10 Pro is the better choice for media consumption and demanding apps.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G95 in the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the 12nm process of the Helio G95 is less efficient than the Snapdragon 480’s 8nm process, the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s larger chassis provides more surface area for heat dissipation. User reports suggest moderate temperatures during gaming, but extended, graphically intensive sessions may lead to some throttling. It's unlikely to be a showstopper, but not ideal for marathon gaming.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the vivo Y53s actually useful if I don't live in an area with widespread 5G coverage?
No. The 5G modem in the Y53s will fall back to 4G LTE if 5G is unavailable. In areas without 5G, the 5G modem offers no tangible benefit and may even consume slightly more power while searching for a 5G signal. The primary advantage is future-proofing for when 5G becomes more prevalent.
❓ How significant is the difference in charging speed between 18W and 33W charging?
The difference is substantial. 33W charging on the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC can typically charge the phone from 0-100% in around 60-75 minutes, while 18W charging on the vivo Y53s will likely take 2-3 hours. This means you can get a significant charge in a short amount of time with the Infinix, making it much more convenient for users on the go.
