The sub-$200 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y52t and Oppo K10x represent compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Y52t leverages MediaTek's Dimensity 700, prioritizing efficiency, while the K10x opts for Qualcomm's Snapdragon 695, aiming for a balance of power and connectivity. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a slightly more modern chipset, the Oppo K10x is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the vivo Y52t offers a compelling alternative for those valuing efficiency and potentially longer battery life, thanks to the Dimensity 700's 7nm process.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | CDMA2000 1x | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 18 | 2022, September 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 19 | Available. Released 2022, September 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.9 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.59 inches, 104.5 cm2 (~84.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12, ColorOS 12.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 67W wired, 80% in 33 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Blue, Black |
| Models | V2166A | PGGM10 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 210 EUR |
vivo Y52t
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to 7nm process
- Reliable performance for everyday tasks
- More affordable (likely, based on brand positioning)
- Extremely slow 10W charging
- Less powerful GPU for gaming
- Older chipset architecture
Oppo K10x
- 67W fast charging (80% in 33 minutes)
- More modern Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Slightly better GPU performance
- Potentially lower battery life due to 6nm process and higher power draw
- May be slightly more expensive
- Thermal throttling possible under sustained load
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the context data focuses on internals, we can infer both likely utilize standard 60Hz LCD panels common in this price bracket. The real difference will likely come down to color calibration and peak brightness, which are not specified. Bezels are also likely comparable, aiming for maximizing screen real estate within the budget constraints. Without further data, it's safe to assume a tie in this category.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature a primary camera and supporting lenses. The image processing capabilities of Qualcomm’s ISP in the Snapdragon 695 may offer slightly better dynamic range and noise reduction compared to the Dimensity 700’s ISP. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes it impossible to definitively declare a winner; both likely rely on cost-optimized sensors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo K10x’s Snapdragon 695 (6nm) benefits from a more modern fabrication process than the vivo Y52t’s Dimensity 700 (7nm). While both CPUs feature a 2x2.2 GHz prime core configuration, the Snapdragon 695 utilizes Kryo 660 Gold cores, generally offering a slight performance advantage over the Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 700. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained loads. However, the Dimensity 700’s efficiency could translate to longer battery life during typical usage. The K10x's Adreno 619 GPU is also likely to outperform the Mali-G52 MC2 in the Y52t, offering a smoother gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Oppo K10x’s 67W charging is a game-changer in this segment. Achieving 80% charge in just 33 minutes is a significant advantage over the vivo Y52t’s slow 10W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed effectively mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage. The Dimensity 700’s efficiency might offer slightly longer runtimes on a full charge, but the convenience of the K10x’s rapid charging is a compelling trade-off.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y52t if you need a reliable, efficient 5G phone for everyday tasks and prioritize battery longevity over blazing-fast charging. It's ideal for users who don't heavily game or engage in intensive mobile workflows. Buy the Oppo K10x if you prefer a quicker turnaround with its 67W charging, and want a slightly more capable chipset for occasional gaming or demanding applications. It's geared towards users who value convenience and a bit more headroom in performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the Oppo K10x handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. The Adreno 619 GPU offers a performance boost over the Dimensity 700’s Mali-G52 MC2, but it’s not a gaming powerhouse. Frame rate stability will depend on the specific device optimization.
❓ How much of a difference will the 67W charging make in daily use with the Oppo K10x?
The 67W charging is a significant convenience. Going from near-empty to 80% in just 33 minutes means you can quickly top up your phone during a short break, minimizing downtime. This is particularly useful for users who frequently travel or have limited access to charging outlets.
❓ Is the Dimensity 700 in the vivo Y52t still a viable option for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Absolutely. The Dimensity 700 is more than capable of handling everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and streaming videos. It’s a reliable and efficient chipset that provides a smooth user experience for non-intensive applications. The trade-off is slower charging and slightly less gaming performance.
❓ Does either phone support VoLTE/VoWiFi for improved call quality?
While not explicitly stated, both phones, being 5G enabled, are highly likely to support VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) depending on carrier compatibility. Check with your mobile carrier to confirm support for your region.
