vivo Y52 5G vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G: A Deep Dive into Budget 5G Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a slightly brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G emerges as the better choice. Its measured 492 nits of brightness and 121-hour endurance rating provide a tangible advantage over the vivo Y52 5G, despite both sharing the same chipset and charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y52 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 7, 28, 40, 41, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, May 18 | 2021, March 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, June 20 | Available. Released 2021, April 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.3 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 161.8 x 75.3 x 8.9 mm (6.37 x 2.96 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~401 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.58 inches, 104.3 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~83.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 400 nits (typ), 500 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, MIUI 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Shiny Black, Glacier Blue | Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray, Nighttime Blue, Aurora Green |
| Models | V2053 | M2103K19G, M2103K19C |
| Price | About 240 EUR | € 96.62 / £ 107.59 |
| SAR | - | 0.94 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.54 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 121h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: 1795:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -27.0 LUFS (Good) |
vivo Y52 5G
- Potentially cleaner software experience (typical of vivo)
- May have a more compact design
- Reliable Mediatek Dimensity 700 performance
- Lack of published display brightness data
- Lower battery endurance compared to Redmi Note 10 5G
- Camera details are unknown
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G
- Measured 492 nits peak display brightness
- Excellent 121-hour battery endurance
- Wider user base potentially leading to faster software updates
- Xiaomi’s MIUI software can be resource-intensive
- Camera processing may be overly aggressive for some users
- Potentially larger form factor
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 492 nits, a significant advantage for outdoor use compared to the vivo Y52 5G, which lacks published brightness data. Both displays share a 1795:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar black levels and color depth. However, the measured value for the Redmi Note 10 5G provides concrete evidence of superior visibility in bright conditions. While both likely utilize IPS LCD technology, the Redmi Note 10 5G’s higher brightness translates to a more enjoyable viewing experience in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature a 'Photo / Video' camera system, lacking specific details in the provided data. This suggests a similar approach to camera hardware, likely including a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially macro/depth sensors. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality differences. However, Xiaomi’s image processing algorithms are generally known for vibrant colors and aggressive sharpening, while vivo often aims for more natural tones. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization for video recording.
Performance
Both the vivo Y52 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm). This chipset features an octa-core configuration with 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, promising similar CPU performance in everyday tasks. The 7nm process node ensures reasonable power efficiency. However, thermal management – a critical factor for sustained performance – isn’t specified for either device. Given the identical chipset, performance differences will likely stem from RAM configuration (not specified) and software optimization. The Redmi Note 10 5G’s larger user base may benefit from more frequent software updates addressing performance bottlenecks.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G holds a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving a measured 121-hour rating. While the vivo Y52 5G’s battery capacity is unknown, the Redmi Note 10 5G’s endurance suggests efficient power management. Both phones support 18W wired charging, implying similar charging speeds – approximately 2-3 hours for a full charge. The Redmi Note 10 5G’s superior endurance means users can expect to go longer between charges, a crucial benefit for those frequently away from power outlets.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y52 5G if you prioritize a clean, streamlined software experience and a potentially more compact form factor (based on typical vivo design language). Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G if you value a brighter display for outdoor visibility and longer battery life between charges, making it ideal for heavy users and travelers.